AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Danielle Mc Coy

MATH102 · MATH · MATH115 · MATH090 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and a stricter classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy homeworkPolarizing teachingStrict workloadCan be helpfulCondescending complaints
  • Reviews are sharply divided between and supportive and students who found her rude or unhelpful.
  • and is described as heavy across multiple years.
  • Success seems possible for students who keep up, but the experience can feel stressful and unforgiving.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and resilience, and multiple reviews describe the workload or as difficult.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course can be understandable when she teaches step by step, but the workload and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One review warns that skipping class means you will not pass, and participation is treated as important.

no online evidence available.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

Recommendation is split because some students praise her clarity and care while others strongly warn against taking her.

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Reviews mention tough , and that may not appear in the grade book.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Several reviews describe lots, tons, or insane amounts of , and quizzes.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with praise for clear step-by-step instruction balanced by complaints about rudeness and poor support.

Format shift

All because no online reviews exist.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments , and tests, with assignments carrying much of the workload burden.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All evidence is in person, and reviews show a high-workload, polarizing course with both strong praise and serious complaints.

Main concern

and some report rude or condescending treatment.

What students said

“Yes, she gives a lot of work but doing a lot of .”
MATH115
“She gives insane amounts of homework.”
MATH102
“ .”
090

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Test HeavyQuizzesFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove exam policy details such as open-book or proctoring.

Test HeavyQuizzesFew Graded Items
“Lots of ”
MATH115
“ and and quizzes.”
MATH102
“Doing the workload helps with the test.”
MATH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Yes, she gives a lot of work but doing a lot of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student experience; credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Load

15/100

“She gives insane amounts of homework.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She teaches the material step by step, so it's easily understood.”

👍 Recommendation Split

46/100

“ ”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Yes, she gives a lot of work but doing a lot of .
  • So do the work and it will pay off !
  • She gives insane amounts of homework.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches the material step by step, so it's easily understood.
  • Lecture and notes are up to par!
  • She is an okay teacher. but gives tons of work!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • she would be very condescending
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 8 in-person reviews span many years and are detailed, but opinions are highly polarized and there is no online evidence.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH2 reviews
MATH0902 reviews
MATH1152 reviews
0901 review
MATH1021 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1