AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Omar Moreno

MATH103 · MATH195 · STATS110 · MATH110 · MATH095 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Moreno if you want a , and exam preparation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring math teacherClear exam supportAccessible outside classCheat sheet allowedHomework matters
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Moreno as caring, patient, and willing to help outside class.
  • His math courses still require homework and notes, but exams , and make-up flexibility.
  • One negative review reports fast pacing and heavy workload, so students who fall behind may struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

73/100

An A is realistic with , and , but math still requires steady effort.

Online evidence is very positive but limited, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Moreno makes math easier to understand, but some courses move quickly and can feel difficult if students fall behind.

The online review says concepts were easy to understand, while but show more workload variation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

and passing, but reviews do not prove a .

In-person reviews suggest skipping hurts performance, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

because he is caring, available, and .

Both formats are positive, with in-person evidence much stronger because it has more reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

He allows cheat , and supportive reviews, even though one tag calls him tough.

Format shift

, while online grading evidence is limited but positive.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework and lecture notes matter, and one student felt overwhelmed, but several say the workload is manageable.

Format shift

outlier, while the online review does not emphasize workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students repeatedly describe him as clear, caring, patient, and lectures or fast pace.

Format shift

Online and confidence in the in-person pattern.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades , and exam preparation, with tests mentioned most often.

Format shift

and homework, while online evidence does not specify assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly , and , though some find the pace and workload hard.

Main concern

Students must keep up with homework and .

What students said

“He lets you use a page of notes for your test and a computer.”
MATH110
“Keep up with the .”
MATH110
“I felt as if I was drowning in the workload.”
STATS110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review says he made math concepts easy and .

Main concern

Online evidence is limited to one very positive review.

What students said

“ and he was readily available for help outside of the class.”
MATH110
“Super patient and makes sure no one is getting left behind.”
MATH110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam setup is student-friendly because comments mention notes, a , and .

One Page Notes AllowedComputer AllowedPractice Tests Similar To ExamsExtra Credit QuestionsMake-Up Test Flexibility

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe exams with support tools such as , and .

One Page Notes AllowedComputer AllowedPractice Tests Similar To ExamsExtra Credit QuestionsMake-Up Test Flexibility
“He lets you use a page of notes for your test and a computer.”
MATH110
“Gives you a with minor changes.”
MATH110
“he allows you to make a cheat sheet for exams.”
MATH110

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super patient and makes sure no one is getting left behind.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Super patient and makes sure no one is getting left behind.”

📝

88/100

“Gives you a with minor changes.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

93/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are easy to follow and he's just got good vibes all around
  • and he was readily available for help outside of the class.
  • He seems to care about his students' success and made sure we had all the opportunities to do well in the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Keep up with the .
  • This class was extremely difficult to say the least.
  • Do the Hw, go to and youll pass!

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • He lets you use a page of notes for your test and a computer.
  • there are 4 exams total with 4 Qs for
  • he allows you to make a cheat sheet for exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years show a consistent positive pattern with enough detail about teaching, workload, and exams.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1107 reviews
MATH1952 reviews
STATS1102 reviews
MATH0951 review
MATH1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2