AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Catherine Samuel-Phillips

CHEM101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if and do not rely on lectures for understanding.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaring PersonConfusing LecturesSelf-Teaching RequiredSlow GradingTest Heavy
  • Students describe her as kind and caring but weak at explaining chemistry clearly.
  • Both reviews say and teaching yourself.
  • , and the course feels test heavy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but it requires heavy independent study because lectures and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course feels challenging because , and and assignments.

All course difficulty evidence is in person, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews , but participation matters and lectures require preparation to follow.

and is not clearly strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Students appreciate her personality but .

Recommendation and is consistently hesitant.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

but also say grading takes weeks or months and assignments are unclear.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report , and outside study to keep up.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students say she is caring but , and not enough to learn the material.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Both reviews tag the class as test heavy, with labs and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but , and slow with grading.

Main concern

Students must rely on the textbook and outside resources to succeed.

What students said

“ and doing all the text exercises is how you will succeed.”
CHEM-101
“I was better off teaching myself all the material with the textbook and YouTube videos.”
CHEM-101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly say the class is test heavy, but .

Test HeavyNo Clear Proctoring EvidenceNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews identify the course as test heavy but do not clearly describe the .

Test HeavyNo Clear Exam Policy
“Test heavy”
CHEM-101
“Test heavy”
CHEM-101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was better off teaching myself all the material with the textbook and YouTube videos.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Her lectures seemed to be all over the place, SUPER fast-paced, and .”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“ and doing all the text exercises is how you will succeed.”

⚖️

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very sweet woman but couldn't navigate the material, text, or .
  • Her lectures seemed to be all over the place, SUPER fast-paced, and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and doing all the text exercises is how you will succeed.
  • She grades assignments months later and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is great as a and sweet

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, detailed, and consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM-1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values