AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Joshua Robles

STATS110 · MATH251 · MATH110 · MATH25145 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
52.17%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you can handle a heavy math workload and are willing to use practice, modules, and office help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentHeavy workloadStats is hardAccessible outside classSelf-teaching risk
  • many praise his care and support, while many criticize and poor structure.
  • The course is not easy content-wise, but , practice, and persistence.
  • Online reviews are generally more positive about organization and support, though they still warn about heavy workload and proctored exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

Strong grades are possible, but students repeatedly say you must work hard, keep up with homework, and ask questions.

Online reviews stress effort and workload, while and serious self-teaching complaints.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Statistics and math content are often described as hard, fast, confusing, or stressful even when he provides practice support.

Both formats describe difficult material, though online reviews more often say he makes it manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

Participation and because multiple reviews say showing up matters and missing class can hurt.

Online reviews explicitly say participation matters, while and asking questions helps you pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students recommend him when they value support and practice, but and lighter workload.

Online sentiment is somewhat more favorable, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

63/100

Grades can be good with effort, and some reviews mention retakes, practice tests, no late penalties, and , but one review calls him tough.

Format shift

Online reviews include and B-average comments, while , and no late penalties alongside some grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Workload is one of the clearest themes, with many reviews citing lots of , and .

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, with online reviews emphasizing group work and proctored exams and in-person reviews emphasizing modules and homework.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He is often caring and accessible, but lecture clarity and course organization are inconsistent enough to split student opinion.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are more positive about organization, while and often criticize .

Assessment method

Balanced

68/100

The course appears to use homework, modules, , and finals rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention group work and exams, while in-person , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with some students calling him excellent and and require self-teaching.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and course structure can vary a lot, especially in harder math courses.

What students said

“ and detailed lectures made the material much easier for me to understand.”
MATH110
“So . Literally did not understand his way of teaching.”
STATS110
“He may understand stats but he can't teach it.”
STATS110

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed-positive, praising organization and care while , and proctored exams.

Main concern

The online workload can be high and .

What students said

“Difficult material, but Josh is an amazing instructor.”
MATH110
“There is a decent amount of work but you have plenty of time to get it done.”
STATS110
“ !!!”
STATS110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but and frequent quizzes make the overall exam risk fairly strict.

Heavily Proctored ExamsProctored ExamsPractice TestsQuiz HeavyNotecard For ExamsSheet For Final

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and a final sheet, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Proctored ExamsPractice TestsQuizzesNotecard For ExamsSheet For Final
“ and I couldnt focus.”
STATS110
“You get a notecard for exams and a sheet for the final.”
MATH251
“Josh makes it easier with practice tests and quizzes and retakes.”
MATH110

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention exams and heavily proctored exams, but do not clearly .

Heavily Proctored ExamsExamsQuiz Heavy
“ !!!”
STATS110
“group work and exams are in the course”
STATS110
“ and quiz heavy”
MATH110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Difficult material, but Josh is an amazing instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“ and detailed lectures made the material much easier for me to understand.”

📚 Workload

24/100

“Beware the class has ALOT of work.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

58/100

“ ! :)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made some of the hardest Statistics topics easy to understand.
  • so that didnt help at all.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Obviously its a hard class no matter what, but Josh makes it easier with and quizzes and retakes.
  • The average grade is a B- if you try hard.
  • Not a very hard course if you do your work

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • So .
  • Beware the class has ALOT of work.
  • Be prepared for lots of hw!

Theme 4

❤️ About Support

  • He is very easy to contact outside of class & is very caring.
  • Anything you need, he's there for you
  • genuinely cared about our success.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

93/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed, consistent themes about workload, support, difficulty, and mixed teaching clarity.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 57
1 out of 53

Course coverage

STATS11011 reviews
MATH11010 reviews
MATH2511 review
MATH251451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

5

B 5

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1