AI Rate Professor

English

Sarah Stevens

ENG010 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you value a and can tolerate slow pacing and uneven expectations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but slow-pacedMixed teaching experienceSome effort requiredInconsistent expectations
  • One review describes her as caring and supportive, while another describes the class as frustrating.
  • Passing can be easy with some effort, but getting a strong grade is not clearly effortless.
  • All evidence comes from in-person ENG010 reviews, with no online data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Passing may be easy with a little effort, but one review says even scraping by required too much work.

All Easy A because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The class sounds intellectually manageable but slow, with topics dragged out rather than deeply challenging.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe .

No online attendance evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is uncertain because the comments sharply .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

One A+ , but another student says it was hard just to skim by with a C.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload seems manageable for one student but excessive for another.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Students split between caring support and a very negative teaching experience.

Format shift

The teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

No format-specific assessment pattern is clearly proven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with one student finding the class supportive and easy to pass and another finding expectations excessive.

Main concern

Expectations and pacing may feel inconsistent.

What students said

“ and supportive.”
ENG010
“Horrible teacher expects so much woke just to skim by with a c”
ENG010

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's an easy class to pass you just have to put in a little effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ and supportive.”

📈 Grade Effort

58/100

“It's an easy class to pass you just have to put in a little effort.”

⚠️ Mixed Experience

50/100

“Horrible teacher expects so much woke just to skim by with a c”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and supportive.
  • Slow moving semester, drags out topics too long.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's an easy class to pass you just have to put in a little effort.
  • Horrible teacher expects so much woke just to skim by with a c

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

limited and conflicting evidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG0102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1