AI Rate Professor

Psychology

T.L . Brink

PSYCH11170 · PSYCH111 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can follow detailed directions, write often, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardParticipation MattersDetailed InstructionsTough GraderGood FeedbackHeavy Writing
  • Grades can be high when students follow detailed instructions and participate daily.
  • and outdated, frustrating teaching methods.
  • Online reviews report the , and strongest warnings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic, but it depends on daily participation, essays, careful instruction-following, and .

In-person evidence makes the A look more predictable, while online evidence includes and workload.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The psychology content is not described as conceptually hard, but the detailed writing requirements and outdated methods raise the challenge.

In-person reviews call the course lengthy but not difficult, while online reviews describe the learning process as difficult and outdated.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly described as strictly mandatory, but daily participation and .

Both formats emphasize participation, with online reviews focusing on daily discussion questions and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students either strongly appreciate the clear structure and , and teaching style.

, while online reviews are divided and include the strongest negative recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

Grades can be high, but multiple and .

Format shift

, while online reviews contain the strongest complaints about strict grading.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Daily discussions, essays, long instructions, and students.

Format shift

Online reviews report heavier workload, while as lengthy but manageable.

Teaching experience

Average

65/100

and accessibility, but negative reviews criticize outdated methods and poor online experience.

Format shift

online teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Comments emphasize discussions, essays, papers, grammar, and participation more than tests.

Format shift

and participation-based assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and say the class is detailed but manageable when students participate, follow the syllabus, and complete essays.

Main concern

Students must keep up with , and detailed instructions.

What students said

“Read and follow the syllabus closely, also, participate in the daily discussions and you should do well in this class.”
PSYCH111
“It may have been lengthy and detailed, but not difficult.”
PSYCH111

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with some students praising support and grade opportunities while others describe outdated methods, heavy writing, and .

Main concern

Online students may face , and .

What students said

“As long as you participate everyday on the .”
PSYCH111
“He is probably the .”
PSYCH11170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Read and follow the syllabus closely, also, participate in the daily discussions and you should do well in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“This professor is a great professor. He is easy to talk to and offers many opportunities to raise grade”

⚖️

36/100

“ mistakes but then make the same mistakes in almost every sentence.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“He gives three page long instructions for an essay, and , but only if you meet the right criteria in the email.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is a great professor. He is easy to talk to and offers many opportunities to raise grade
  • Professor Brink is one of the .
  • He uses a textbook that he wrote himself and has a very outdated teaching method.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • As long as you participate everyday on the .
  • It may have been lengthy and detailed, but not difficult.
  • He is probably the .

Theme 3

📝 About Writing And Instructions

  • Read and follow the syllabus closely, also, participate in the daily discussions and you should do well in this class.
  • Do the daily discussions, correct classmate's grammar for ! :)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across recent and older terms give useful but sharply mixed evidence, with stronger confidence on workload and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSYCH1113 reviews
PSYCH111703 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1