AI Rate Professor

History

S. Keys S. Keys

HIST101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you value engaging history lectures, but because papers and deadlines matter.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging lecturesCaring personalityPassionate teachingPaper-heavy workloadStrict late penalties
  • Lectures are lively, informative, and personable.
  • .
  • Late penalties can be severe even when students recover quickly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Getting an A and careful deadline management, with little forgiveness for late work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content sounds manageable and engaging, but the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not give a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students praise his teaching style, but the heavy workload and strict penalties create a mixed recommendation picture.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

The strongest grading evidence is a 50% late penalty on a paper.

Format shift

This judgment is based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

One review reports something due almost every week and highlights many papers.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students describe him as informative, interactive, funny, passionate, and personable.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews emphasize papers and weekly assignments rather than tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe engaging lectures and a caring style, but and strict deadline penalties.

Main concern

The main concern is a .

What students said

“Professor Keys' lectures were informative, interactive, and NOT BORING!”
HIST101
“almost every week we had something due”
HIST101
“was deducted a late penalty of half credit. 50%.”
HIST101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Keys' lectures were informative, interactive, and NOT BORING!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Keys' lectures were informative, interactive, and NOT BORING!”

📚 Workload Pressure

32/100

“almost every week we had something due”

⚖️

28/100

“was deducted a late penalty of half credit. 50%.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Keys' lectures were informative, interactive, and NOT BORING!
  • Professor Keys is very passionate about his job.

Theme 2

📄 About Workload And Grades

  • almost every week we had something due
  • The
  • was deducted a late penalty of half credit. 50%.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, and they are split between strong praise and workload complaints.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values