AI Rate Professor

English

Elizabeth Langenfeld

ENGLISH101 · ENG160 · READING976 · ENG155 · ENGLISH976 · ENGL976 · ENGL155 · ENGL152 · ENG152 · ENG101 · ENG976 · ENGL160 · ENG914 · 72 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
28.13%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want intensive writing training and can handle strict rules, heavy work, and possible frustration.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy workloadTough graderStrict attendanceHelpful feedbackPolarizing
  • Students agree the class , and attention to instructions.
  • Some students say she improves writing through feedback, but and harsh policies.
  • Online reviews are notably more negative, with repeated , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly say it , and following detailed instructions.

Online reviews describe harsher grade risk, while who keep up with the workload.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is challenging mainly because of , and detailed writing expectations.

Both formats are challenging, but online students more often describe the structure as overwhelming and confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Attendance and timely participation are repeatedly described as strict and grade-critical.

, while online reviews mention missed work and late work leading to drops or penalties.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because many students warn against taking her despite some praise for feedback and writing growth.

Online reviews are mostly avoidant, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students often call her a tough grader and , and .

Format shift

as especially unforgiving, while but sometimes paired with revision chances.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

The workload is consistently described as lots of , and detailed instructions.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online reviews especially emphasizing overload and constant announcements or requirements.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching is polarizing because and care, while others describe confusion, rudeness, and stress.

Format shift

Online teaching is rated much worse than .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment appears dominated , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus heavily on assignments and writing, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong praise for writing improvement but , and grading.

Main concern

The main risk is a demanding workload combined with and .

What students said

“ .”
ENG101
“we had a .”
ENGLISH101

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing unclear , and poor online communication.

Main concern

Students report overload, harsh policies, and .

What students said

“She just didn't seem to know how to do a class online.”
ENG155
“ if you're not ready!”
ENG155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and do not clearly prove exam format, book rules, or proctoring policies.

Tests MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“if you just read the book, study for .”
READING976

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have a job or other .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

25/100

“Grades tough but does give you multiple .”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“There is some work to put in this class so make sure you have the time for it.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She did teach us a lot about how write a paper and .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • There is some work to put in this class so make sure you have the time for it.
  • we had a .
  • If you already have a .

Theme 2

⚖️

  • .
  • She , and very strict, contradictory in what she posts.
  • You can't miss any assignments or workshops otherwise you will get an F or be dropped from the class.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She definitely makes you work for your grade but helps you along the way.
  • She gives an overwhelming amount of instruction and if you mess up .
  • Professor L doesnt set you up to fail, and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

72

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years and show consistent themes of heavy workload, strictness, and polarized teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 58
3 out of 512
2 out of 59
1 out of 518

Course coverage

ENG15211 reviews
ENG15510 reviews
ENG1016 reviews
ENG9764 reviews
ENG1603 reviews
Show 9 more courses
ENGLISH1013 reviews
9762 reviews
ENGL1602 reviews
ENGL9762 reviews
ENGLISH9762 reviews
READING9762 reviews
ENG9141 review
ENGL1521 review
ENGL1551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 4 · A 12 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 6 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1