AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Angelica Baccari

MATH110 · MATH085 · MATH250 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you value compassion and , but expect to learn a lot independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaring and compassionateSelf-teaching requiredDisorganized lecturesLenient gradingHeavy homework
  • Students consistently describe her as caring, supportive, and willing to help.
  • Several reviews say lectures or and students must teach themselves.
  • , but the workload and independent learning burden can be high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

and deadline flexibility help, but many students say good grades require substantial self-teaching and homework.

The online review stresses heavy self-teaching, while and deadline flexibility.

Is the course easy?

Standard

49/100

The material is not described as impossible, but and missing examples make it harder to learn.

Online evidence sounds harder because lectures are basic and , while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some reviews mention participation, but the comments do not clearly prove a .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly establish a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and compassion, but several warn that her teaching can be .

In-person reviews are polarized, while the one online review is mostly negative about course structure.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

One review directly says she is super lenient and changes deadlines, and some students earned strong grades despite teaching themselves.

Format shift

The , while the online review does not describe grading as lenient.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The online review reports 75 or , and multiple reviews say students must work hard independently.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is clearly heavy, while but still tied to self-teaching.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Her care and motivation are strong, but , and weak lecture organization lower the teaching score.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is negative, while in-person reviews range from excellent support to very .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments emphasize textbook problems, homework uploads, reading, and .

Format shift

, and in-person evidence does not clearly shift the balance toward exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

compassion and serious complaints about organization and lecture clarity.

Main concern

Lecture organization and clarity vary sharply by student experience.

What students said

“She cares and wants you to succeed, it shows and she helps in any way she can.”
MATH110
“Her notes and and she makes a lot of mistakes.”
MATH110
“ and will change dead lines.”
MATH250

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review says the course relies on textbook problems and .

Main concern

Students may have to teach themselves from the textbook.

What students said

“You WILL be teaching yourself.”
MATH250
“then you're given 75+ HW questions a week.”
MATH250

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You WILL be teaching yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Her notes and and she makes a lot of mistakes.”

❤️ Student Support

62/100

“She cares and wants you to succeed, it shows and she helps in any way she can.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“then you're given 75+ HW questions a week.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures are very short and very basic.
  • when it comes to her lectures.
  • She does not give enough examples and wastes time on writing down long definitions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and will change dead lines.
  • Received a good grade but she was not the reason for it.
  • You'll need to work harder in this class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares and wants you to succeed, it shows and she helps in any way she can.
  • She workes with students and motivate each student to keep going and not give up.
  • She wants students to succeed and does what it takes to make it happen.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews include detailed comments across online and in-person formats, but the opinions are strongly polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1103 reviews
MATH0852 reviews
MATH2502 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1