AI Rate Professor

Biology

Kwame Eshun

BIO2200 · MICRO102 · BIOL0011 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless , and tolerate strict or unclear grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest HeavyTough GraderUnclear ExamsKnowledgeable But StrictSelf-Taught Feel
  • Reviews are sharply split, but negative comments repeatedly describe hard, unfair, or unpredictable exams.
  • Some students praise his knowledge, caring, , and willingness to help.
  • Both online and in-person students , and major effort needed for good grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments repeatedly say , and surviving harsh grading.

Both formats show A grades are possible, but online reviews especially stress self-teaching and unpredictable tests.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

Microbiology content is demanding and , and weak alignment between lectures and tests.

Online reviews focus on unpredictable tests and self-teaching, while and difficult reports.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and participation matter because missing class makes it and labs.

Both formats include participation or skip-class warnings, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

because exams and , and disconnected from class material.

, though a minority in each format praise his knowledge and support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call him a and say exams, labs, reports, and even are graded heavily.

Format shift

Harsh grading appears in both formats, with in-person reviews giving the strongest examples about labs, reports, and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

The course requires heavy studying, demanding exams, labs, reports, and extra work to compensate for .

Format shift

Online students describe self-teaching and memorization, while and .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

He is described as knowledgeable and sometimes caring, but many students and not enough for the exams.

Format shift

Online complaints center on self-teaching and , while and confusing directions.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Assessment , and a few high-impact graded items.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, with and an unknown organism report.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews also describe a difficult, test-heavy class with , and high study demands.

Main concern

In-person students , and unclear reports.

What students said

“ and tough, including lots of work. .”
MICRO102
“The .”
MICRO102

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but , and tough grading.

Main concern

Online students often felt exams were unpredictable and not well aligned with class material.

What students said

“I received an A only due to my hard work.”
MICRO102
“ but you would literally need to memorize each sentence for his test.”
MICRO102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students describe difficult, time-pressured, unpredictable tests with .

Test HeavyTimed ExamsUnpredictable QuestionsMultiple Choice With Written AnswersLow Class Averages

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and multiple-choice tests with written answers, but they do not clearly prove closed-book policy.

Timed ExamsMultiple Choice With Written AnswersLab ExamsUnfair Tests
“I always ran out of time as I was taking the test.”
MICRO102
“ answers and they are not easy.”
MICRO102

Online

Online reviews explicitly describe heavy, unpredictable tests and low class averages, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Heavy TestsUnpredictable QuestionsLow Class AveragesExtra Attempt Later
“Not .”
MICRO102
“Class average on test were about 65% or lower.”
MICRO102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I received an A only due to my hard work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🧪 Teaching Quality

35/100

“I feel like the professor loves to speak about microbiology more than he teaches it.”

⚠️

20/100

“ from class.”

⚖️

18/100

“He even grades harsh.”

Theme 1

🧪 About Teaching Style

  • Professor is very knowledgeable and class is a bid difficult, but if you read and listen to the class, you'll be able to do well.
  • I self taught myself the whole semester.
  • He is a as a friend but not a good teacher.

Theme 2

📝 About Exams And Grades

  • Not .
  • The .
  • grade.
  • Class average on test were about 65% or lower.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Make sure put in time to do the work and you are set.
  • and tough, including lots of work.
  • The class is hard so be prepared to study a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 detailed reviews are evenly split by format and repeatedly identify the and .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MICRO10214 reviews
BIO22001 review
BIOL00111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

3

B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1