AI Rate Professor

Biology

Sumana Pasala

MICRO150 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can learn independently and handle inconsistent teaching support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Teaching QualityResponsive for Some StudentsTest HeavyHeavy Self-StudyInconsistent Support
  • and serious frustration.
  • Online evidence says the class is straightforward but requires heavy self-teaching.
  • Students who stay disciplined may pass, but unsupported students may struggle badly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A seems possible but requires dedication because students mention difficult tests, major-course expectations, and .

Online evidence is more negative about self-teaching, while but still not effortless.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Microbiology is described as difficult, test heavy, and demanding even when the class routine is predictable.

The online review calls the class very difficult, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews do , though participation and live sessions matter.

In-person reviews mention participation and lecture sessions, while the online review does not show an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because some students praise her responsiveness while others describe poor teaching and no support.

The online review is clearly negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades do not look impossible, but and a need for dedication keep grading from seeming lenient.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence includes both an A and serious concerns.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload appears heavy because students mention , and needing to find information independently.

Format shift

Online comments emphasize self-study, while and lecture-heavy concerns.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching quality is highly inconsistent, with strong praise from some students and severe complaints about low effort from others.

Format shift

Online evidence is poor, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

as the main pressure, with homework and lectures supporting the course.

Format shift

, but details are clearer in and the online complaint.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and one harsh complaint about reliance on old recordings.

Main concern

Teaching support appears inconsistent across students.

What students said

“ so far.”
MICRO150
“When you go to lecture zoom calls she will tell you to watch her lectures instead of teaching.”
MICRO150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes a straightforward routine but poor teaching and .

Main concern

Students may need to find much of the .

What students said

“All of her powerpoints are from others online and .”
MICRO150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because students mention and tests that may not match provided information, but .

Test HeavyMismatched TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Test HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Test heavy”
MICRO150

Online

The online review says tests do not match the provided information, but reviews do not clearly prove .

Mismatched TestsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ ”
MICRO150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Students who slack cannot pass this class as this is major course for nursing major”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ so far.”

⚠️

35/100

“you have to be dedicated and find all the information”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“Awesome choice and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • so far.
  • she gives no effort in teaching
  • Laziest professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Students who slack cannot pass this class
  • This was by far one of the most difficult classes
  • Test heavy

Theme 3

💬 About Support

  • She was very accommodations and responsive
  • If you are looking for a professor who cares and wants to help this is not her

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent reviews give useful but limited evidence, and opinions are sharply inconsistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MICRO1504 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2