AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Pia Kennedy

HUM0930 · HUM101 · HUMANITIES101 · HUM102 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

She can be rewarding in person for students who like humanities discussions, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but PolarizingReading HeavyStrong LecturesTough GraderPresentation Heavy
  • Most in-person students praise her care, lectures, and willingness to help.
  • The online review is extremely negative and describes poor structure and harsh communication.
  • Workload and and long presentations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Students can earn A grades, but , and timed quizzes make the A require real effort.

Online evidence sounds much harsher, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content is manageable but , and lecture attention demands make it more than an easy class.

Online evidence points to unclear direction, while mixed engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

One in-person student says she is reasonable about sickness, but participation matters appears in several reviews.

In-person evidence supports some flexibility, while the online review focuses on .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

60/100

Students are split, but the because , and engaging.

, while in-person evidence leans positive despite workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

but tough enough that multiple reviews mention pressure and standards.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions a tight quiz, while and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload is heavy because , and multiple long presentations.

Format shift

and presentations, while the online review highlights a .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Most in-person students describe her as caring, inspiring, and engaging, though online and .

Format shift

In-person teaching is generally praised, while the single online review reports poor direction and communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and quizzes rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions a vocab quiz, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about care and lectures, but , and attention issues.

Main concern

Reading, presentations, and .

What students said

“her lectures are fantastic”
HUM101
“Expects you to do multiple long presentations.”
HUM101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes poor organization, little direction, and a .

Main concern

The and stressful online.

What students said

“No syllabus, very little direction”
HUM101
“Expects a 49 question vocab quiz to be done in 30 minutes.”
HUM101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with one online timed vocab quiz mentioned and .

Timed Vocab QuizExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review mentions a 49-question vocab quiz in 30 minutes, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Timed Vocab QuizExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Expects a 49 question vocab quiz to be done in 30 minutes.”
HUM101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She cares and is always willing to go the extra mile to help you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“her lectures are fantastic”

⚖️

45/100

“ and just one of those professors that thinks their class is the most important.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

60/100

“I would go to any of her classes, because she is a great teacher”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You can tell she loves teaching and she is very inspiring.
  • her lectures are fantastic
  • she makes class interesting

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • Expects you to do multiple long presentations.
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares and is always willing to go the extra mile to help you.
  • Or insult you for asking a question.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years give useful detail, but the single online review limits format-specific confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HUM1014 reviews
HUM09301 review
HUM1021 review
HUMANITIES1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1