AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Jose Pablo Romero

CIS101 · ACCT209 · ACCT208 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
77/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if and want a fair professor who responds quickly.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOrganizedResponsiveFair but demandingHomework heavyExtra credit varies
  • Online reviews are mostly positive and describe an .
  • Accounting courses are difficult and .
  • Getting a strong grade is realistic if students complete weekly work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is achievable, especially online, but accounting students , and only limited .

Online evidence includes and successful grades, while in-person and little extra credit.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The computer course sounds easy, but accounting content is repeatedly described as difficult, fast-paced, and confusing.

Online reviews are mixed by course, while in-person reviews strongly describe ACCT208 as challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation matters in at least one online class.

Online evidence mentions participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students generally recommend him because , and fair despite demanding coursework.

Online reviews are more favorable, while in-person reviews are more cautious because of and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

criteria online but hard exams and limited in accounting.

Format shift

Online reviews mention and clear criteria, while and little extra credit.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Accounting students report , and .

Format shift

Online accounting has weekly work and fast pacing, while as tedious and busy.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

He is organized, knowledgeable, and responsive, but .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is stronger, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and finals rather than one single method.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention homework, quizzes, midterm, final, and a project, while and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person accounting reviews are much harsher, emphasizing hard , and limited .

Main concern

Students found the class hard, tricky, and time-consuming.

What students said

“ ! and the homeworks and tedious and time consuming.”
ACCT208
“This is the hardest .”
ACCT208

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe organized courses with , and a mix of easier general computing and harder accounting content.

Main concern

, and fast pacing can make online accounting demanding.

What students said

“Could say, one of the .”
CIS101
“Hw and .”
ACCT209
“ and on top of things.”
ACCT209

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

accounting allowing two attempts but in-person accounting described as hard and tricky.

Midterm and FinalTwo AttemptsHard ExamsTricky Midterms

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe hard and tricky exams, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

Hard ExamsTricky Midterms
“ !”
ACCT208
“The 3 midterms taken are hard and tricky.”
ACCT208

Online

Online reviews mention a midterm and final with 50 questions and two attempts, but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Midterm and FinalTwo Attempts
“Midterm and final 50 questions, two attempts kinda hard.”
ACCT209

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and on top of things.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“ and on top of things.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“Hw and .”

⚖️

58/100

“Firm but fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and on top of things.
  • He also responded quickly to questions and came across as having complete mastery of his chosen field.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The subject was a little difficult.
  • This is the hardest .
  • Not much given.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across online and , but some are older and course experiences differ.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT2082 reviews
ACCT2092 reviews
CIS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values