AI Rate Professor

Geography

Noah Ebner

GEOG110 · GEOG100 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from the textbook and and tests.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyTextbook dependentPoor communicationTough graderUnclear instruction
  • Most students describe the course as textbook-heavy, test-heavy, and light on instruction.
  • Communication and responsiveness are major problems across both formats.
  • A few students succeeded by reading carefully, but the overall experience is risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned As, but the path , and difficult tests.

Online reviews include one straightforward A experience, while and test-heavy grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content feels harder because students must rely heavily on the textbook with little instruction or lecture support.

Both formats describe textbook-heavy learning, with online reviews especially emphasizing and advanced tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though in-person complaints mention the professor being late or absent.

, while in-person evidence focuses on instructor attendance rather than student attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because of poor instruction, weak communication, and .

Online reviews are mixed but mostly negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call him a and and tests with little support.

Format shift

and test-heavy evidence.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

There may , and tests, but the textbook load is heavy and stressful.

Format shift

Online GEOG100 had few tasks beyond tests, while GEOG110 reviews in and testing.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Most comments describe , and unprofessional behavior.

Format shift

Online reviews cite and poor communication, while and rude behavior.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Assessment , and textbook-based exams.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention weekly quizzes and four tests, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, citing unclear , and unprofessional behavior.

Main concern

Students felt unsupported and .

What students said

“Gives no instructions whatsoever.”
GEOG110
“Usually late, if he shows up at all, he tends to be unprofessional and rude”
GEOG110

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a mostly textbook-driven course with , and difficult communication.

Main concern

Students report , poor communication, and .

What students said

“There were at all, very little instruction, and poor communication.”
GEOG110
“this class would and four tests.”
GEOG100
“The class is textbook heavy and test heavy”
GEOG110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course is highly test-heavy, and reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring details.

Weekly QuizzesFour TestsTest HeavyTextbook-Based Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

Weekly QuizzesTestsTest Heavy
“ and .”
GEOG110

Online

Online reviews clearly mention textbook-based quizzes and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Weekly QuizzesFour TestsTest HeavyTextbook-Based Tests
“this class would and four tests.”
GEOG100
“quizzes and material in the textbook.”
GEOG110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There were at all, very little instruction, and poor communication.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in instruction, testing, and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“There were at all, very little instruction, and poor communication.”

🧪

90/100

“this class would and four tests.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Gives no instructions whatsoever.
  • There were at all, very little instruction, and poor communication.
  • Usually late, if he shows up at all, he tends to be unprofessional and rude

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is textbook heavy and test heavy
  • quizzes and material in the textbook.
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews across both formats show consistent themes of , and poor communication.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

GEOG1105 reviews
GEOG1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values