AI Rate Professor

Science

Oliver Eshun

MICRO125 · MICRO102 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Take him only if and and study consistently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict GraderMixed Teaching ExperienceExam Review SupportLecture Heavy
  • Students describe him as strict and difficult, with sharply mixed experiences.
  • One review says he supports students through exam reviews, while .
  • Getting an A appears possible only with steady work and studying.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

An A is possible, but , and grading risk rather than an easy path.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The material can feel manageable with study, but the class is described as tough and lecture heavy.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One review warns that skipping class prevents passing, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation is split because one student valued his support while another strongly warned against taking him.

, and they sharply disagree.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students describe him as strict, tough, and possibly unfair with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not described as overwhelming, but success requires doing the work and studying.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and poor communication.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews are available, with conflicting teaching experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Comments , and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and a very negative grading experience.

Main concern

Strict and .

What students said

“He is a bit strict and tough, but do the work and study the material and it is easy.”
MICRO102
“He won't answer questions, he changes the way he grades mid semester, very unfair with .”
MICRO125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and exam reviews, but .

Exam ReviewsTests Adjusted During SemesterFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention testing adjustments and , but not a .

Exam ReviewsTests Adjusted During Semester
“He adjusted testing as the semester went on and ”
MICRO102
“Graded by few things”
MICRO125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a bit strict and tough, but do the work and study the material and it is easy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“He adjusted testing as the semester went on and thoroughly went through exam reviews in order to do the best to pass.”

⚖️

25/100

“He won't answer questions, he changes the way he grades mid semester, very unfair with .”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“Stay away from this professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He can be hard to read as a person, but he wants his students to be successful and is willing to work with them.
  • He won't answer questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He is a bit strict and tough, but do the work and study the material and it is easy.
  • he changes the way he grades mid semester, very unfair with grading

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they strongly conflict.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MICRO1021 review
MICRO1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values