AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jairo Enciso

PRESTATS · MATH085 · MATH160 · STATS110 · MATH110 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you value a and can tolerate participation-heavy classes with inconsistent lecture quality.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but inconsistentTest heavyParticipation requiredMixed lecture clarityExtra credit
  • Students are sharply split between praising his care and .
  • Grades , and practice support are available.
  • Participation and group work are recurring concerns for students who prefer independent learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

An A is realistic with effort because reviews mention friendly grading, , and exam reviews, but weak lectures can raise the .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content is not necessarily extreme, but rushed pacing, mistakes, and .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is highly mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation appears important because reviews mention random calling, group work, and warnings that skipping class hurts performance.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Recommendation is mixed because and care help some students, while others strongly dislike the lecture organization.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

62/100

Grading trends lenient due to friendly grading, , and , though some reviews still call him tough.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload seems moderate, but , and participation demands can make it feel inefficient.

Format shift

All workload comments are from in-person classes.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with several students praising his care while others report rushed lectures and repeated mistakes.

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

Assessments appear exam-centered because , and test-heavy tags.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

support and but serious complaints about rushed, mistake-prone lectures.

Main concern

Lecture quality and participation-heavy structure vary enough that some students feel forced to teach themselves.

What students said

“He's a , and as the real exams.”
MATH160
“He made a lot of mistakes during the lecture, students had to keep correcting him.”
STATS110
“He rushes through lectures and notes.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam setup appears standard and review-based, with helpful practice support but .

Test HeavyExam ReviewsPractice ExamsExcel Allowed On Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and Excel use, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Test HeavyExam ReviewsPractice ExamsExcel Allowed On Tests
“ as the real exams.”
MATH160
“He gives extra time for the homework and also so you know what to prepare for.”
MATH085
“He not only let us use Excel for tests & HW, but also showed us how to use it during lectures.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will be doing yourself a disservice if you take statistics with anyone other than Jairo Enciso.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Lectures are a little all over the place.”

⚖️

62/100

“He's a , and as the real exams.”

👍 Recommendation Split

62/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He rushes through lectures and notes.
  • He made a lot of mistakes during the lecture, students had to keep correcting him.
  • Hes great and always looking to help students . Hes funny and makes it easy to learn

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's a , and as the real exams.
  • He gives extra time for the homework and also so you know what to prepare for.
  • Prof. Encisco is quality. He makes sure to thoroughly go over the material you will be tested on and encourages participation in the course.

Theme 3

🧩 About Participation

  • Does a lot of group work and calls on you randomly by picking name sticks.
  • He does a lot of group work because he wants everyone to get to know each other better which is pointless to me.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because eight reviews span multiple courses and years, with consistent themes despite divided opinions.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1103 reviews
STATS1102 reviews
MATH0851 review
MATH1601 review
PRESTATS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1