AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Nick Romano

CIS135 · CIS101 · CIS100 · CIS130 · CIS117 · CISSECT · CIS162 · WEBDESIGN · COMPSCIENCE · CIS114 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a fair professor who rewards initiative, but do not expect every lecture to feel highly engaging.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFair and supportivePassionate about cybersecurityLenient gradingParticipation mattersMixed lecture value
  • Students often describe Romano as fair, caring, and willing to help students who show initiative.
  • Grades appear achievable because several comments mention lenient tests, searchable work, or .
  • Teaching quality is mixed because strong cybersecurity reviews contrast with older complaints about boring or low-value classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A looks very realistic because students mention , and good grades with limited pressure, though effort and initiative still matter.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

and relaxed, but some computer science material and older lecture complaints keep it from being effortless.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance appears useful and sometimes important, especially where participation matters, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

, and achievable grades, despite a few complaints about boring or weak instruction.

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

because students mention allowed Googling, searchable work, and good grades even on weak presentations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

74/100

Workload appears light to moderate, with comments about relaxed classes, early dismissal, and work that could be completed or researched easily.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

73/100

Teaching is generally supportive and knowledgeable, but several older reviews call the class boring or not very educational.

Format shift

and older concerns about lecture value.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention tests, presentations, chapter assignments, and projects, so assessment .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and often lenient professor with some inconsistency in lecture engagement.

Main concern

Some students felt the lectures were boring or not very useful.

What students said

“Romano is a very fair teacher.”
CIS130
“He seems extremely knowledgable and will work with you to help you earn a good grade.”
CIS135
“I feel that I have not learned anything valuable in Flash.”
CIS162

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but student comments explicitly describe tests or work that can be Googled, making the exam style student-friendly.

Tests Can Be GoogledAllowed GooglingLow Exam Pressure

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Googled, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book policy, webcam use, or .

Tests Can Be GoogledAllowed Googling
“All work and .”
CIS130
“Don't sweat the pp presentation, you'll get a good grade even if it sucks.”
CIS101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He seems extremely knowledgable and will work with you to help you earn a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

73/100

“Professor Romano really helped me get a and inspired me to pursue my bachelors degree in the field.”

⚖️

82/100

“All work and .”

👍 Recommendation Value

84/100

“If in a red hot second.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and obviously passionate about his job.
  • , but the class was interesting.
  • Teaches to collect a paycheck.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Effort

  • He seems extremely knowledgable and will work with you to help you earn a good grade.
  • Don't sweat the pp presentation, you'll get a good grade even if it sucks.
  • If anyone was willing to put in half the effort he would try to meet them half-way.

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • Cares about the students.
  • Laid back and treats you as an equal.
  • More concerned with the student's learning process over achievements.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

and show consistent themes of fairness and leniency, though some older comments are vague.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CIS1303 reviews
CIS1352 reviews
CIS1001 review
CIS1011 review
CIS1141 review
Show 5 more courses
CIS1171 review
CIS1621 review
CISSECT1 review
COMPSCIENCE1 review
WEBDESIGN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1