AI Rate Professor

Theater

Andrew Gilchrist

THART145 · THART100 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you , and a highly stressful theater environment.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisrespectful toneMicromanaging directionHarsh feedbackDisorganized expectationsHeavy workload
  • All four reviews strongly warn against taking him and report poor treatment of students.
  • Students describe disrespect, belittling, micromanaging, and constantly changing expectations.
  • Grades can still be high, but the experience is described as stressful and unrewarding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

High reported grades suggest passing is possible, but the , and changing expectations make the A feel hard-earned.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course experience feels difficult because students , and unclear direction.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but participation and rehearsal expectations appear important.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

No student recommends him, and the comments repeatedly .

because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

because one review tags him as a and comments describe berating and constantly changing expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload appears heavy because reviews mention many papers, participation pressure, long rehearsals, and shifting notes.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Teaching experience is extremely poor because every review describes disrespect, micromanagement, belittling, or lack of direction.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and rehearsal work than formal exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative and describe a , and difficult classroom or rehearsal experience.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report belittling, micromanagement, disrespect, and shifting notes.

What students said

“This man is not a good teacher.”
THART145
“this guy is a nightmare”
THART100
“ !!”
THART100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm, or final requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Save yourself the trouble and switch majors, this guy is a nightmare.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“This man is not a good teacher.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

0/100

“I am saving you from the horrors of !!”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

10/100

“treats all his casts with utter disrespect”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He would always refuse to let actors make acting choices
  • he micro manages and tells the actors how to act
  • This guy just wants to belittle anyone who he comes in contact with.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Student Treatment

  • treats all his casts with utter disrespect
  • you want to get berated for not being up to date on his notes that change by the minute
  • I am saving you from the horrors of !!

Theme 3

📚 About Work and Expectations

  • So many papers
  • Participation matters
  • his notes that change by the minute

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because , but they are recent, detailed, and completely consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

THART1002 reviews
THART1452 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values