AI Rate Professor

Science

Andrew Goddard

ENVS101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you can learn independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedRambling LecturesUnclear AssignmentsNot RecommendedHeavy Homework
  • All three reviews strongly criticize organization and teaching clarity.
  • Students describe random or .
  • No review recommends taking this professor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students expected an easy A but and poor organization that make earning a high grade frustrating.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content does not sound conceptually extreme, but the disorganized delivery makes the course .

, and they focus on confusion caused by teaching style.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe an .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every review warns against taking the professor because of disorganization, poor lectures, and weak support.

All , and it is uniformly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Grading policy is not well described, but random and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention lots of homework and .

Format shift

, and they consistently cite assignment problems.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students describe rambling lectures, poor organization, and little useful teaching support.

Format shift

, and all are strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention tests, quizzes, random assignments, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, citing disorganization, rambling lectures, and shifting assignments.

Main concern

Students say the class is because assignments and expectations change unpredictably.

What students said

“He was disorganised and uncertain, often assigning tasks that he would later forget about or completely change.”
ENVS101
“ and does not go by the syllabus.”
ENVS101
“The book is a better teacher.”
ENVS101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a few tests, quizzes, and a , but .

Tests And QuizzesPresentation FinalUnclear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests, quizzes, random assignments, and a , but .

Tests And QuizzesPresentation Final
“There's only a few tests and quizzes and .”
ENVS101
“We had a class presentation for ”
ENVS101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

15/100

“The book is a better teacher.”

Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ .”

Workload And Structure

25/100

“ and does not go by the syllabus.”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • He very often rambles during lecture and often is extremely hard to converse with.
  • During lectures he rambles on and usually goes off topic.
  • Very boring class and I feel like he does not teach well.

Theme 2

About Assignments

  • He was disorganised and uncertain, often assigning tasks that he would later forget about or completely change.
  • and does not go by the syllabus.
  • There's only a few tests and quizzes and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed reviews from the same course are consistent, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENVS1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1