AI Rate Professor

Personal Activities

Daniela Perez

CD211 · CD112 · CD105 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can handle long lectures and note-taking, but if you need an energetic or interactive class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLecture HeavyLots of NotesFair GradingSlow PaceExtra Credit
  • Students say Daniela Perez knows the material and can teach it, but classes are heavily lecture-based.
  • The , and in one course many observation hours.
  • Grades can be fair and A grades are possible, but enthusiasm is limited because the format can feel boring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A grades are possible with fair grading and , but students , and observation hours.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The material is not described as conceptually hard, but the huge curriculum and lecture volume make it tedious.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention participation and , but do not clearly prove a .

and is indirect.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students respect her knowledge and fairness, but because lectures are slow and note-heavy.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students mention and , and two reported A grades support a reasonably fair path.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students describe lots of reading, nonstop notes, papers, and 48 observation hours in one course.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

She is knowledgeable and considered good by some students, but slow and lecture-heavy delivery weakens the experience.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and observation hours more than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but lecture-heavy professor with and substantial note-taking.

Main concern

The main concern is boredom from slow, lecture-heavy classes and heavy notes.

What students said

“Lecture, Lecture, Lecture!!! Be prepared to read and .”
CD211
“The class has a huge curriculum so class is 100% lectures.”
CD105
“she treaches so slow that you get bored just sitting there even though .”
CD112

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One review says tests are tough, but reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Tests Are ToughExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove format, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Tests Are ToughExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ ”
CD105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class has a huge curriculum so class is 100% lectures.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, , and recommendation limits. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“She's a good teacher& really knows what she's talking about, but she treaches so slow that you get bored just sitting there even though .”

📚 Workload

32/100

“Be prepared to read and .”

⚖️

62/100

“She seems to grade fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lecture, Lecture, Lecture!!!
  • The class has a huge curriculum so class is 100% lectures.
  • she treaches so slow that you get bored just sitting there

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She seems to grade fairly.
  • Participation matters

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Be prepared to read and .
  • Prepare your hand for non-stop note taking
  • SO MANY PAPERS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews from a close time period are consistent about lecture style and note-taking, but the sample is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD1051 review
CD1121 review
CD2111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values