AI Rate Professor

Physics

Raymond Sachs

PHYS221 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can handle inconsistent teaching experiences and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMixed Teaching QualityTough GraderParticipation MattersExam Mismatch
  • Reviews are split between one strong recommendation and two negative experiences.
  • Students disagree on clarity, with one praising examples and another saying questions were answered poorly.
  • Quizzes and and difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students mention , and tests needing to be easier.

All evidence comes from in-person PHYS221 reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Physics content is not described as impossible, but students report and different angles on concepts.

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation matters is explicitly tagged, suggesting attendance or in-class engagement affects performance.

Only in-person reviews mention participation, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Two of three reviews are negative, and one student directly .

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Tags like Tough Grader and graded by .

Format shift

, and the evidence leans strict.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Homework and quizzes are mentioned, but the reviews do not prove an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching feedback is inconsistent, with one strong positive review outweighed by concerns about clarity and answering questions.

Format shift

All and is sharply mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and few graded items, indicating a mixed but exam-relevant structure.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed, with one student praising examples and two students criticizing clarity, accommodation, or exams.

Main concern

Students may struggle with and .

What students said

“Quizzes and .”
PHYS221
“He does many examples and demonstrations which help us understand the concepts better.”
PHYS221

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students mention quizzes and exams, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Quizzes and Exams DifferTests Feel DifficultExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams, with concern that tests differ from quizzes and need to be easier.

Quizzes and Exams DifferTests Feel Difficult
“Quizzes and .”
PHYS221
“The .”
PHYS221

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Quizzes and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Needs to be more accommodating and really needs to phrase concepts in different angles!”

🧪

35/100

“Quizzes and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

35/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does many examples and demonstrations which help us understand the concepts better.
  • He was bad at answering questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The .

Theme 3

💬 About Student Fit

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they include specific and and clarity.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYS2213 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values