AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sean Smith

MATH110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid Smith unless and and poorly designed assessments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedConfusing explanationsVague teachingPoor test designNot recommended
  • Both students report severe teaching problems, including poor preparation and .
  • Homework and .
  • The as a disaster that students could not finish.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because , and one reported grade is a C.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels harder because concepts are not explained clearly and .

, and both describe the course as confusing due to teaching issues.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One tag says skipping class means you will not pass, even though as valuable.

tag.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students do not recommend him because he is unprepared, vague, and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

20/100

Assessment seems harsh or unreliable because a and one student earned a C.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is not described as huge, but homework and because they are poorly aligned with instruction.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload and testing problems.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Both reviews say he is unprepared, vague, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Students mention homework and badly designed second test.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students describe Smith as , and weak at designing tests.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves because class explanations and assessments are unreliable.

What students said

“His teaching style was not good at all.”
MATH110
“He's always ”
MATH110
“No one in the class finished it.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam experience is high risk because students report an proctoring evidence.

Overlong TestPoor Test DesignReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

too long for the class to finish and was never returned or graded.

Overlong TestPoor Test Design
“ so long that no one completed it.”
MATH110
“The .”
MATH110
“We never got it back and he never graded it.”
MATH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's always unprepared, is unable to explain concepts, We regularly have to correct the formulas he writes up on the board.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, preparation, and assessment problems. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“His teaching style was not good at all.”

⚠️ Assessment Risk

15/100

“ so long that no one completed it.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

3/100

“He should NOT be teaching.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His teaching style was not good at all.
  • He is very vague at times.
  • He's always

Theme 2

🧮 About Course Support

  • Many things that were on the .
  • We regularly have to correct the formulas he writes up on the board.

Theme 3

📝 About Tests

  • so long that no one completed it.
  • Most people only got halfway through.
  • We never got it back and he never graded it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed, recent to each other, and strongly consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values