AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Larry Fike

PHIL11 · PHIL101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a strong teacher and are willing to prepare for challenging but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear and knowledgeableIndividualized supportDifficult but fair testsEngaging philosophy teacher
  • Students describe him as , and entertaining.
  • Tests are difficult, but classwork and provided resources make success realistic.
  • He adapts well to individual learning needs and builds interest in philosophy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with steady classwork and use of resources, but as difficult.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course is intellectually meaningful and tests are hard, but .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person evidence exists, and it does not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly praise his teaching, clarity, and ability to make philosophy interesting.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

because difficult tests can be handled by doing the work and using resources.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is not described as excessive, but students must keep up with classwork and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently describe him as , and responsive to individual needs.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The only clearly described assessment is difficult tests, with no strong assignment evidence.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

clarity, knowledge, and individualized support.

Main concern

if students do not use the class resources.

What students said

“He is fantastic at meeting each students' individual needs and speeds of learning.”
PHIL11
“ .”
PHIL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly say tests are difficult but .

Difficult TestsResources Provided

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention difficult tests, but as .

Difficult Tests
“ , but if you do the work in class and use the resources he gives you, you'll be fine.”
PHIL11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will leave this class smarter then when you entered.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“ .”

⚖️ Fair Challenge

68/100

“ , but if you do the work in class and use the resources he gives you, you'll be fine.”

👍 Student Support

92/100

“He is fantastic at meeting each students' individual needs and speeds of learning.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He is fantastic at meeting each students' individual needs and speeds of learning.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Growth

  • , but if you do the work in class and use the resources he gives you, you'll be fine.
  • You will leave this class smarter then when you entered.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are consistent and specific.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1011 review
PHIL111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values