AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Corey Hardin

ENGINEERING101 · PHYSIC110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless and accept high exam risk.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery hard testsGenerous curvesFast lecturesPoor grade transparencyLittle homework
  • Students describe tests as very hard, but .
  • Lecture pacing and alignment are major problems, with complaints that homework and .
  • , so credibility is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

, but and GPA warnings make an A feel costly and uncertain.

All evidence is from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and poor alignment between lecture and homework make the course intellectually demanding.

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Students warn against the class because , and .

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but and grade transparency is poor.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

One review says homework is fairly light, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students describe fast lectures, poor alignment, and missing grade information despite some after-class help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Student , and the final, with homework playing a smaller role.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe fast or , and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ , but .”
PHYSIC110
“things from lecture have nothing to do with homework.”
ENGINEERING101
“ unless you want to kill your GPA.”
ENGINEERING101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because tests are described as very hard and low-scoring, though .

Very Hard TestsLow Test AveragesGenerous CurvesFinal Grade Uncertainty

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and low averages, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, quiz, midterm, or final format beyond a .

Very Hard TestsLow Test AveragesGenerous CurvesFinal Mentioned
“ , but .”
PHYSIC110
“Averages on the tests were between 65 and 75 percent.”
ENGINEERING101
“everyone went into final not knowing the grade they had in the class.”
ENGINEERING101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you want to kill your GPA.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“things from lecture have nothing to do with homework.”

📝

25/100

“ , but .”

⚖️

55/100

“does not post grades online everyone went into final not knowing the grade they had in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He goes fast in lecture
  • things from lecture have nothing to do with homework.
  • He'll help with anything after class.

Theme 2

📝

  • , but .
  • Averages on the tests were between 65 and 75 percent.
  • Worked harder in this than in Calculus and got a worse grade FML

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they give limited but consistently negative detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGINEERING1011 review
PHYSIC1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values