AI Rate Professor

Foreign Languages

Jaclyn Vincent

ASL1 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless you can handle a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized courseChanging syllabusPoor teachingCostly materialsUnclear final prep
  • Students describe the class as and repeatedly changed.
  • Teaching quality is criticized as very weak for college level.
  • The final and and unsupported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A appears difficult because expectations and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content itself is not described as deeply hard, but poor teaching and shifting requirements make the course feel harder.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person ASL1 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students strongly discourage the class because , and unclear.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report and expectations changed repeatedly.

Format shift

, and both point to unfair or unstable policies.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students describe pointless busy work, a costly book, and a .

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person ASL1 reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe her teaching skill as terrible and the class as horribly run.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and both are strongly negative about teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a four-part final, suggesting both assignments and exams matter.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, focused on disorganization, syllabus changes, poor teaching, and .

Main concern

The main concern is unstable course management and poor instructional support.

What students said

“Didn't follow syllabus duedates or .”
ASL1
“She is moody and changed the syllabus at least 10 times.”
ASL1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The study guide, which students found poorly supported.

Four-Part FinalNo Study GuideUnclear Exam Preparation

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

study guide but do not clearly prove book rules or proctoring.

Four-Part FinalNo Study Guide
“The final had 4 parts and she never gave a study guide for it.”
ASL1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is by far the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“teaching skill for college level is terrible.”

⚖️ Course Organization

15/100

“She is moody and changed the syllabus at least 10 times.”

🚫 Student Recommendation

8/100

“Class is horribly ran and she should be seriously reviewed..”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This is by far the .
  • teaching skill for college level is terrible.

Theme 2

📋 About Organization

  • Didn't follow syllabus duedates or .
  • She is moody and changed the syllabus at least 10 times.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • The final had 4 parts and she never gave a study guide for it.
  • Had to buy a $70 book which we only used once a month for pointless busy work which consisted of typing one paragraph..

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are consistent and detailed enough to flag major risk.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ASL12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values