AI Rate Professor

English

Diana Ramseyer

ENG102 · ENGLISH015 · ENG101 · ENGLISH · ENGLISH102 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you are highly independent and comfortable with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh GradingUnhelpful FeedbackRude ToneUnfair GradesAvoid Recommended
  • Most students describe Ramseyer as rude, unfair, and unhelpful.
  • Several reviews specifically claim grades depend on opinion or favoritism rather than earned work.
  • A small minority says prepared students can do well, but the dominant experience is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few prepared students report earning an A, but repeated claims of unfair and .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course difficulty comes less from content and , and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students mostly warn against taking her because they find her rude, unhelpful, and unfair in grading.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Multiple reviews say she withholds A grades, grades by personal opinion, or bases grades on whether she likes the student.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and instructor behavior than workload, so the workload itself is not clearly proven to be overwhelming.

Format shift

Workload and is not very specific.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most comments describe her as rude, unhelpful, unfair, or lacking subject knowledge, despite a few positive outliers.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews repeatedly discuss papers, assignments, and dominate assessment.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

treatment, little help, and unpredictable or unfair grading.

Main concern

The main .

What students said

“Mean, unfair, and unhelpful.”
ENGLISH102
“She grades based on whether or not she likes a student.”
ENGLISH102
“Prepare for random guesses and grades based on her opinions.”
ENG102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grading, and do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the . Mean, unfair, and unhelpful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“ .”

⚖️

12/100

“She grades based on whether or not she likes a student.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

18/100

“Do yourself a favor by not taking any classes with this one.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • You can tell she hates her job.
  • She gets better at the end (there is hope)

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She WILL NOT give you an A as .
  • Prepare for random guesses and grades based on her opinions.
  • I wrote all kinds of and still got an A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Mean, unfair, and unhelpful.
  • Openly dislikes her job anyway, so do her a favor by avoiding her.
  • She is tough but will help if you ask her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 10 older reviews are mostly consistent but include a few conflicting positive experiences and two no-comment ratings.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1014 reviews
ENGLISH1023 reviews
ENG1021 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH0151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values