AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bibiana Lopez

MATH102 · MATH103 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself most of the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesVery difficultSelf-teaching requiredPoor question supportAvoid if weak in math
  • Students and hard to learn from.
  • The class demands major outside help, including tutoring or .
  • Comments suggest she may mean well, but the teaching experience is poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report needing tutoring, self-teaching, and strong prior math skills.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The math content feels harder because and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and none clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students strongly discourage taking her because they .

All recommendation evidence is in person and consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, but extreme difficulty and self-teaching make the grade path feel unforgiving.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report needing tutoring and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students repeatedly describe her lectures as , and ineffective for learning math.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The and central to learning.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessment, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe , and heavy reliance on tutoring or .

Main concern

The main concern is that students feel they must learn the material outside class.

What students said

“I spent more time in the tutoring center then i did in her class.”
MATH102
“The .”
MATH103
“ and and .”
MATH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Online Homework MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“All the homework as online and that is the only way I learned the material.”
MATH103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I spent more time in the tutoring center then i did in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ and and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

📈 Difficulty & Effort

28/100

“I spent more time in the tutoring center then i did in her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The .
  • She was hard to understand, didn't answer questions well
  • and and .

Theme 2

📚 About Learning Support

  • I spent more time in the tutoring center then i did in her class.
  • asking questions often leaves you feeling like you just had a conversation with the wall.
  • All the homework as online and that is the only way I learned the material.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and highly consistent in their negative teaching assessment.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1022 reviews
MATH1031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values