AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ryan Yamada

MATH265 · MATH250 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if you want a rigorous math class with , but if you need heavy review and patient support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear but toughDifficult examsDetailed feedbackLimited test reviewMixed helpfulness
  • and an early Calc 1 experience that felt discouraging.
  • Exams and as difficult and thought-heavy.
  • but uneven support when students ask for help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears to require real effort because , and as difficult.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content is challenging because students say he forces deeper thinking and difficult proof-like work.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Recommendation depends on the student because two reviews praise his teaching while one strongly advises choosing someone else.

All and is mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

but fair because he grades all assigned work and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is heavy because homework and tests are described as fairly difficult.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Teaching quality is mixed, with but one severe complaint about support and engagement.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they show both strong praise and serious criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and exams, with exams carrying major difficulty.

Format shift

and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a but may give limited test review and uneven help.

Main concern

The main concern is difficult exams with limited review in at least one course.

What students said

“He made me hate math.”
MATH250
“His tests and ”
MATH265
“ and is always willing to answer questions”
MATH265

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly describe difficult exams, but .

Difficult ExamsLimited Test Review

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult exams and or book policy.

Difficult ExamsLimited Test Review
“gives almost NO review for tests”
MATH250
“ ”
MATH265

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and is always willing to answer questions if a student is struggling with a particular concept.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“ and is always willing to answer questions if a student is struggling with a particular concept.”

🧠

35/100

“He definitely forces his students to think (especially on exams, which are generally pretty difficult).”

⚠️ Mixed Support

55/100

“ , and gives almost NO review for tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he did try hard to teach the material and .
  • and is always willing to answer questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • His tests and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • He made me hate math.
  • I strongly advise looking for a different teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only three older reviews, but they contain specific and consistent comments about difficulty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2652 reviews
MATH2501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values