AI Rate Professor

English

Kathleen Farrell

ENGLISH914 · FRESHMANCOMP · ENG102 · ENG101 · ENGLISH · ENGL101 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProAvoid stronglyUnclear teachingHarsh gradingPoor communicationUnorganized class
  • Students overwhelmingly describe the class as , and frustrating.
  • Many reviews say she is hard to understand and reacts poorly to questions or disagreement.
  • Grades are viewed as harsh and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Even when workload time seems light, students report bad grades after repeated revisions and .

All evidence comes from in-person English reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material may not be intellectually advanced, but unclear teaching and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

One review says she does not take roll and class can be very short, but most .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students repeatedly because they find the , and poorly organized.

All and is overwhelmingly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students describe repeated revisions followed by poor grades and one F for a paper topic, suggesting harsh and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload may not be heavy in time, but repeated paper reviews and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload and paper revision.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Reviews consistently describe her as , and unhelpful when students ask questions.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Comments focus mostly on papers, revisions, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, emphasizing unclear instruction, poor communication, disorganization, and .

Main concern

Students say they do not learn much and still receive poor grades.

What students said

“ !! Bad Idea!”
ENG102
“She doesn't and absolutely NO help.”
ENG101
“ .”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and grades, and do not clearly prove any exam policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Has no idea what she is doing, but thinks handing out bad grades means she is teaching well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 , and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She doesn't and absolutely NO help.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

10/100

“ !! Bad Idea!”

⚖️

12/100

“ and over again, telling us what to fix, yet we would still receive non-satisfying grades.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • there was no learning going on in this class.
  • She is very hard to understand
  • .

Theme 2

📉 About Grades

  • she gave me an "F" on it for the topic.
  • all and OVER and still gives a bad grade.
  • handing out bad grades means she is teaching well.

Theme 3

🚫 About Student Advice

  • !! Bad Idea!
  • This is the If you see her run!!!!!!!!
  • Farrell should be avoided.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years are highly consistent in warning about poor teaching and grading, though they are old.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG1013 reviews
ENG1023 reviews
ENGL1011 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH9141 review
Show 1 more courses
FRESHMANCOMP1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1