AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lam Wong

MATH102 · MATH103 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and relying on extra study or tutoring.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear TeachingSelf Study RequiredExam HeavyHard To UnderstandNeeds Tutor
  • Students describe the teaching as , and hard to understand.
  • and there are no study guides, making outcomes risky.
  • Passing may be possible with extra studying, but students warn against taking the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A because tests are heavily weighted and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content is harder because students say he skips steps, gives no study guides, and is hard to understand.

Only in-person reviews exist, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students warn against taking him because , and exam-heavy.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

because each test is worth 30 percent and there is little support for preparation.

Format shift

and test weight.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The assigned workload is not described as huge, but students need extra studying or tutoring to compensate.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Teaching quality is very weak because students say he is unhelpful, hard to understand, and skips problem steps.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

because each test is described as 30 percent of the grade while homework is only 10 percent.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and tests dominate the grade.

Main concern

Students may need outside help because .

What students said

“Expect to need a tutor because .”
MATH103
“No study guides for tests and each test is 30% of you grade with homework as 10%.”
MATH103
“ but it can be done with some extra studying.”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

No Study GuidesHigh-Stakes TestsExam-Heavy Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lack study guides, but does not clearly prove book policy or proctoring rules.

No Study GuidesHigh-Stakes TestsExam-Heavy Grading
“No study guides for tests and each test is 30% of you grade with homework as 10%.”
MATH103

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Expect to need a tutor because he is not helpful.He get's lazy and student to visually see how to get the answer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Expect to need a tutor because .”

🧪

90/100

“No study guides for tests and each test is 30% of you grade with homework as 10%.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ but it can be done with some extra studying.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He can be quite hard to understand.
  • He get's lazy and student to visually see how to get the answer.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No study guides for tests and each test is 30% of you grade with homework as 10%.
  • but it can be done with some extra studying.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews are available, with two detailed comments and one no-comment entry.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1032 reviews
MATH1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values