AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Sierra Feasel

PSYC200 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and forgiving grading support.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesClear gradingUnderstanding teacherTest correctionsHelpful support
  • Students consistently describe her as sweet, understanding, and easy to follow.
  • Grades are supported by , and help on major work.
  • because participation activities are graded, but missed days seem handled forgivingly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

A strong grade is very attainable because , and she helps with major assignments.

All evidence comes from in-person PSYC200 reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

79/100

Students say she makes everything easy to understand, though tests and a research proposal still require work.

and course structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

She is forgiving about missed days, but in-class participation activities count toward the grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

and emphasizes her clarity, kindness, and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

, and strong reported grades make grading feel generous and supportive.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

70/100

The workload includes tests, participation activities, and a research proposal, but students describe the structure as manageable with support.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students consistently describe her as , and supportive.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and a research proposal, with exams appearing central.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews praise her , and forgiving approach to missed days.

Main concern

Participation activities make showing up useful, and lectures may feel slow for some students.

What students said

“Very understanding and forgiving for any days missed.”
PSYC200
“the ”
PSYC200
“you get participation as a grade through activities you do in class, so try to show up”
PSYC200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam structure is student-friendly because reviews mention study guides and , but .

Three 50-Question TestsStudy GuideTest Corrections

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe three 50-question tests with study guides and , but do not clearly prove open-book status or .

Three 50-Question TestsStudy GuideTest Corrections
“She has 3 , 50 question tests throughout the semester.”
PSYC200
“You get to fill out a study guide beforehand to practice then after the ”
PSYC200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ms. feasel is super friendly and makes everything easy to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“ms. feasel is super friendly and makes everything easy to understand.”

⚖️

86/100

“then after the ( .5 points back for every answer)”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“Such an amazing teacher and she is so sweet! Very understanding and forgiving for any days missed. !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was amazing loved the class very cool very calm.
  • ms. feasel is super friendly and makes everything easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You get to fill out a study guide beforehand to practice then after the
  • the
  • a few tests and a overall research proposal that she totally helps you with.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because four recent reviews are consistent and detailed, though all are for PSYC200.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYC2004 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1