AI Rate Professor

Cuyamaca College · Physics

Matt Steiger

PHYC130 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you want a and gives useful support.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear lecturesCaringAccessibleHelpful with homeworkStrong exam review
  • .
  • , and email help.
  • The course feels manageable, but one B- shows the A is not completely automatic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The class looks very manageable with strong support, but the B- grade means an A still requires doing the work.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students say the lectures cover what is needed and concepts are reviewed patiently when students struggle.

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person PHYC130 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

The reviews do .

In-person reviews mention class and office help but do not prove an ; there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and accessible.

The recommendation evidence is entirely from in-person students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Grades appear favorable and one student says he is forgiving for appropriate reasons, but the evidence is limited.

Format shift

; there are no online reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

Homework and labs are mentioned, but students frame them as manageable with .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and available outside class.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, labs, tests, and and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and availability for help.

Main concern

There , and tests.

What students said

“The lectures taught what I needed to know for the tests”
PHYC130
“Very patient and willing to go over concepts again if you don't understand.”
PHYC130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

TestsExam Review Material

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews say lectures and review materials prepare students for tests, but .

TestsExam Review Material
“The lectures taught what I needed to know for the tests”
PHYC130
“provided great review material for the exams.”
PHYC130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The professor and provided great review material for the exams.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“The lectures taught what I needed to know for the tests”

🤝 Student Support

95/100

“Very patient and willing to go over concepts again if you don't understand.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

98/100

“The professor ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures taught what I needed to know for the tests
  • Very patient and willing to go over concepts again if you don't understand.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • the professor was always available for help on the .
  • with email responses

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent, consistent, and specific.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYC1302 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values