AI Rate Professor

De Anza College · Ethnic Studies

Lawrence Lan

CETH10 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you are ready to read closely, write carefully, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy WorkloadDetail-Focused QuizzesCaring but PolarizingReading Intensive
  • Most , and high effort for CETH10.
  • Positive , and helpful if students keep up with readings.
  • Online reviews are more consistently negative than in-person reviews, especially about workload and handwritten assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

26/100

Getting an A appears possible, but students , and careful writing.

Online evidence is strongly negative on effort, while but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course content is not described as conceptually impossible, but and the .

Online reviews emphasize detail-heavy quizzes and handwritten work, while and writing precision.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory, though one in-person review .

, but the in-person record is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Most reviews are negative because and workload outweigh the positive comments about passion and care.

, while in-person reviews are sharply split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Multiple students call him a tough or , and grades range from A to D despite some positive experiences.

Format shift

Online reviews consistently describe difficult grading, while and one successful A experience.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and time-consuming work.

Format shift

Online reviews stress excessive work for an online class, while and outside museum work.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few students praise his care and passion, but most reviews describe the class as unhelpful, strict, or poorly managed.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly negative, while and awful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Comments focus , and museum assignments rather than major exams.

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split between highly caring teaching and .

Main concern

The main concern is that earning a high grade may require heavy daily work.

What students said

“Great professor, very caring!”
CETH10
“I would have to spend 6 hours a if I wanted an A so I took the C like a good boy.”
CETH10

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews describe a demanding class with , and .

Main concern

The main concern is heavy workload for an online class.

What students said

“This professor is very strict and has high expectations for every assignment.”
CETH10
“Does way too much for an online class, doing handwritten assignments and grades very difficult and is just annoying in general.”
CETH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention strict quizzes and anti-AI quiz design, but they do not clearly prove a .

Detail-Focused QuizzesAnti-AI Quiz DesignNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reading-based quiz difficulty, but they do not clearly prove midterm, final, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Anti-AI Quiz DesignReading-Based Quizzes
“He is very anti-AI so if you use AI, you will fail.”
CETH10

Online

Online reviews mention detail-focused quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Detail-Focused QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ pay close attention to everything.”
CETH10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just put in the , and you'll be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Great professor, very caring!”

⚖️

24/100

“Very bad, assigned so much work & was a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“Does way too much for an online class, doing handwritten assignments and grades very difficult and is just annoying in general.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Guided incredibly insightful class discussion.
  • Very passionate.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This professor is very strict and has high expectations for every assignment.
  • I would have to spend 6 hours a if I wanted an A so I took the C like a good boy.
  • Just put in the , and you'll be fine.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Many assignments, 2 museum field trips that require paying out of pocket and were not clearly mentioned beforehand.
  • This was a required course and I didn't expect the rigirous amount of .
  • Does way too much for an online class, doing handwritten assignments and grades very difficult and is just annoying in general.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews give useful detail, but the sample is small and sharply polarized.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CETH106 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values