AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Marx Gomez-Liendo

SOCD001 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you want a , and a very strong chance at a high grade.

Best fit · Easy A HunterCaringGenerous Extra CreditClear FeedbackLight WorkloadHighly Recommended
  • Students consistently describe Marx Gomez-Liendo as , and highly supportive.
  • Online students report very light weekly work, generous , late-work flexibility, and .
  • In-person reviews are also very positive, though and one student noted slightly harsh grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

High grades look very attainable because students repeatedly mention light work, , lenient late policies, and .

Online evidence is stronger for an easy A, while but includes one .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The course content appears approachable because , and students call the class easy.

Online reviews emphasize light weekly reflections, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

62/100

Attendance rules vary because , while two in-person reviews and one online review say it was mandatory.

Online attendance is mostly flexible, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Every review is a five-star recommendation, with students , and .

Both online and showing more detail about workload and grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

Students repeatedly mention , lenient late work, full-credit flexibility, and clear grading, despite one in-person .

Format shift

Online grading sounds very generous, while but slightly less lenient.

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

Workload is consistently described as minimal, usually weekly short reflections, simple assignments, and .

Format shift

Online reviews strongly support a very light workload, while but still call the class easy.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe him as , and .

Format shift

Online students praise responsiveness and feedback, while in-person students praise engaging lectures and support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

Reviews point , and projects rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly mention weekly writing and projects, while , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews praise his caring teaching, engaging lectures, organized Canvas modules, and .

Main concern

Attendance is less flexible in some in-person sections, and .

What students said

“His lectures were engaging and helped me understand the material.”
SOCD001
“He offers and .”
SOCD001
“Sometimes he grades a little harsh, but and an easy class”
SOCD001

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are extremely positive, with students praising light weekly work, generous , fast responses, and .

Main concern

Participation and weekly reflections still matter, even though the workload is light.

What students said

“For .”
SOCD001
“ , and actually reads through ur paper and .”
SOCD001
“ , so .”
SOCD001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and weekly reflections, and reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or strict proctoring rules.

Projects Serving As MidtermsLarge Final ProjectWeekly ReflectionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or final format.

Online

Online reviews mention weekly reflections, projects serving as midterms, and a , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly ReflectionsProjects Serving As MidtermsLarge Final ProjectOnline Video Discussions
“There is a ~300-word weekly sociological reflection every week.”
SOCD001
“ as midterms.”
SOCD001
“The of your grade”
SOCD001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The options.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“His lectures were engaging and helped me understand the material.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

100/100

“ .”

⚖️

91/100

“Super sweet and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were engaging and helped me understand the material.
  • his lectures are engaging and divided into sizable chunks so they are 30 minutes long at most.
  • You can tell he is passionate about sociology!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • For .
  • , so .
  • He let me turn in a and gave me full credit.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He clearly cares about his students' success and was always willing to answer questions.
  • and .
  • , and actually reads through ur paper and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because there are 10 recent reviews from 2025 and 2026 with consistent ratings, grades, and detailed comments.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOCD00110 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 5 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values