AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Arcie Moreno-Vasquez

MATH124 · MATH121 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take this professor if you want a feeling overwhelming.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExcellent explanationsCaring supportExtra credit opportunitiesFlexible assignmentsProject effort required
  • Students strongly praise the professor's clarity, care, and ability to make math understandable.
  • The class is not overwhelming, but and steady attention.
  • All evidence is from in-person courses, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Good grades are reachable through support, options, and , but A or B .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The math content becomes manageable because , and helpful for students who struggle.

, and they consistently describe the course as understandable rather than effortless.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do .

The and outside help but do not prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend the professor because the , and confidence-building.

All recommendations come from in-person students, with no online evidence to compare.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and assignment options make grading forgiving, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

70/100

Most students did not feel overwhelmed, but and effort.

Format shift

In-person workload is generally manageable, and no online workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Reviews consistently praise clear explanations, care, relatability, and strong outside-class help.

Format shift

All and is strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize weekly assignment options, projects, and .

Format shift

, and exams, while online evidence is unavailable.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe clear , and manageable workload.

Main concern

Earning an A or .

What students said

“Overall a great professor that I did.”
math-121
“I never felt overwhelmed by this class, but still felt like I was learning a lot!”
MATH-124

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Exam Point RecoveryProject Requirements

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention exams only through make-back opportunities, and they do not clearly prove the .

Exam Point Recovery
“She also provides a lot of .”
math-121

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall a great professor that I did.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ and super helpful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ !”

📈 Grade Effort

72/100

“earning an A or B requires 2-3 projects.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor made learning fun and relatable using references we understood.
  • .
  • The trig she taught us helped me tremendously for my precalc and calc 1 classes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She also provides a lot of .
  • I never felt overwhelmed by this class, but still felt like I was learning a lot!
  • The and effort.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent, detailed, and highly consistent in-person reviews provide strong confidence despite no online data.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

math-1212 reviews
MATH-1242 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values