AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael Valdez

MATH194 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you can , and strict grading in a demanding math class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLots of homeworkFast lecturesSlides-based teachingStrict attendance
  • Both in-person reviews describe heavy WebAssign or .
  • Students say tests and and one A.
  • Lectures are criticized as fast and mostly slide reading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

One student earned an A, but both reviews say the and the workload demands real effort.

All evidence is from In person reviews, with no Online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course is challenging because lectures are fast, , and students cannot just plug and chug.

Only In , so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

because students can only .

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation is mixed because one student would return after earning an A, while another withdrew and strongly criticized the class.

All recommendation evidence is from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Both reviews call him a tough or and required work shown.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students report lots of and .

Format shift

Only In person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Students say lectures are fast and mostly slide reading, though .

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment and tests, with WebAssign worth 40 percent.

Format shift

Only In person reviews describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a and .

Main concern

Students may struggle with , and .

What students said

“Very harsh ”
MATH194
“Lots of webassign HW, automatically graded and worth 40%.”
MATH194

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is strict because and limited graded opportunities.

Harsh test gradingFew graded itemsTest after absence

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

items, and a test soon after the professor returned from missed classes.

Harsh test gradingFew graded itemsTest after absence
“Very harsh ”
MATH194
“Missed 3 weeks of class and still gave a .”
MATH194

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He also lectures very fast, and they were mainly him just reading off slides, which can be .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“each day of and getting mad at something.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Lots of webassign HW, automatically graded and worth 40%.”

⚖️

18/100

“Very harsh ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He also lectures very fast
  • they
  • each day of

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very harsh
  • Hes a
  • You cant plug and chug, you need to show him you understand.

Theme 3

📚

  • Lots of webassign HW, automatically graded and worth 40%.
  • .
  • Lots of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because two recent reviews are detailed and consistent, though the sample is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1942 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1