AI Rate Professor

EMT amp Paramedic

Paul Cassolary

EMSFO52 · EMS052 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take this class if you want a demanding but manageable.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspirationalSupportiveExperiencedEngagingEffort rewarded
  • Students , and knowledge-rich teaching style.
  • The course can look intimidating, but students say the material becomes doable with his guidance.
  • Students report that effort is rewarded and both reviews give A+ grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Both students earned A+ grades, but comments stress that the reward comes from putting in effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The material is tough and can feel intimidating, but his detailed teaching makes it doable.

, so no online comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters is tagged, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students are highly enthusiastic because , and available for questions.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Both reported grades are A+, but comments frame success as earned through effort rather than automatic.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The course seems effort-heavy but rewarding, with no evidence of an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students describe him as phenomenal, supportive, experienced, engaging, caring, and highly recommended.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews discuss effort and participation but as dominant.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students describe him as , and .

Main concern

The class may feel intimidating at first and requires real effort.

What students said

“His EMTA and , and packed with knowledge.”
EMS052
“You will definitely feel rewarded for how much effort you put into the class.”
EMS-FO52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, quiz format, midterms, or finals.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Phenomenal professor. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, effort, and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“His detailed teaching style makes tough material feel doable”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“Phenomenal professor. .”

⚖️ Effort And Reward

72/100

“You will definitely feel rewarded for how much effort you put into the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His EMTA and , and packed with knowledge.
  • His detailed teaching style makes tough material feel doable
  • Has an abundance of experience and really brings it to the classroom.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You will definitely feel rewarded for how much effort you put into the class.
  • Looks intimidating at first but is incredibly friendly

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • The EMS faculty truly cares about our success.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Two very recent, consistent, detailed reviews support the main conclusions, though the sample is still small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

EMS-FO521 review
EMS0521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values