AI Rate Professor

History

David Okonyan

HIST171 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want engaging history lectures, but if you need a light GE.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerGreat In PersonDemanding OnlineReading HeavyTough GraderEngaging Lectures
  • In-person students strongly praise his lectures, humor, and care.
  • and describes heavy difficulty and workload.
  • The class rewards students who want to learn history, read consistently, and attend lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Grades are high, but students , and heavy work, especially online.

In-person students say effort can lead to strong grades, while online students describe the same course as demanding and tough.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course is readable and understandable in person, but the and online intensity make it more than an easy GE.

as engaging and manageable, while online reviews call it very difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly mandatory, but , and participating.

In-person reviews stress showing up and participation, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format, with strong in-person praise but .

, while online students do not recommend the course.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Students mention , but as fair and achievable with work.

Format shift

Online reviews tag him as tough and graded by few things, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The class has a substantial reading load and online students describe the workload as extremely demanding.

Format shift

Online reviews report the heaviest workload, while lot.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

Teaching is highly praised in person but rated very poorly online, creating a mixed overall experience.

Format shift

, while online feedback is sparse and strongly negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention reading, homework, participation, and few graded items, but do not clearly describe a .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize few graded items, while , and lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, humor, care, and understandable heavy material.

Main concern

Students should expect lots of reading and lecture-heavy learning.

What students said

“if you truly care to learn about history he is an amazing professor!”
HIST171
“Great teacher, his lectures are engaging and funny, the but fair.”
HIST171
“Amazing and hilarious Professor!”
HIST171

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are consistently negative and describe the course as very difficult, demanding, and too much work.

Main concern

Online students report excessive workload and .

What students said

“ .”
HIST171
“This course is very difficult and too much work for a GE course”
HIST171
“Course was extremely demanding. .”
HIST171

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove specific exam rules, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyGraded By Few Things

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyGraded By Few Things
“Graded by few things”
HIST171

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“But if you truly care to learn about history he is an amazing professor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, separating online and , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Great teacher, his lectures are engaging and funny, the but fair.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“Course was extremely demanding. .”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are engaging and funny
  • Amazing and hilarious Professor!
  • very caring and thoroughly makes sure you understand

Theme 2

📚

  • be ready to do alot of reading.
  • This course is very difficult and too much work for a GE course
  • Course was extremely demanding. .

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades

  • the but fair.
  • Easy as long as
  • Just show up and listen you will finish with 100%

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent reviews give a useful signal, but online comments are brief and clustered on one date.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HIST1717 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 4 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values