AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Tommy Olson

Courses not reported · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if , and want a fair but strict first-responder style class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAnti-AI enforcerClear communicatorTough but fairStrict deadlinesCaring when you try
  • .
  • Strict on late work and AI use; grades can stall if you miss one post or expect rounding.
  • Students who communicate and do original work often get As and deep personal support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Content is manageable but , and AI/late penalties mean .

Online reviews stress work-for-A fairness; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Many call it easy and predictable with few graded items, though reading load and anti-cheat rules raise the bar.

Easiness comments come mainly from online sections.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

; structure is asynchronous with deadline rules instead.

Online reviews dominate; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Majority praise clarity, fairness, and care; minority cite inflexible late policy and AI false positives.

Online majority recommends; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

, and aggressive AI enforcement keep grading strict.

Format shift

Online and in-person both reflect strict AI and .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Few graded items but , and original work expectations.

Format shift

Mostly online evidence; graded-by-few-things is a common tag.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

and real-world first-responder framing win praise; AI-detector disputes hurt some experiences.

Format shift

Online teaching praised; in-person AI handling heavily criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Discussions, weekly posts, and a small set of .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and discussions over exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and refusal to accept proof that discussion answers were not AI-generated.

Main concern

Accused of over-flagging human work as AI with no remedy.

What students said

“he thought that our answers for the and . has a bad ai detector and doesnt know how technology works.”
111111

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections are predictable and clearly structured; Olson is strict on late work and AI but flexible in true emergencies and .

Main concern

Zero tolerance for missed early posts and AI use can tank an otherwise easy A.

What students said

“Prof Olson was a really great communicator and .”
111111
“You'll work for your A but he's fair. Take if you're willing to do your own work and not use AI to cheat.”
111111
“Missed a Sat night About Me post by 1 day, which was not accepted.”
111111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely describe classic proctored exams; and late rules.

Assignment-heavyAI integrity checksFew graded itemsClear late policy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Only one review mentions discussion grading via an AI detector with disputed false positives; .

AI detector on discussions
“he thought that our answers for the and .”
111111

Online

Online work is assignment- and discussion-based with strong AI policing and strict late-work rules rather than proctored exams.

Assignment-heavyAI integrity checksStrict late workFew graded items
“Those who used AI were called out and rightfully so.”
111111
“He is strict about late work, but if you communicate about an emergency in a reasonable time, he will work with you.”
111111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'll work for your A but he's fair. Take if you're willing to do your own work and not use AI to cheat.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (6 online, 1 in-person), focusing on clarity, late/AI policy, and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

76/100

“Prof Olson was a really great communicator and .”

⚖️

36/100

“Wouldn't round up. After a family death, I requested a .”

❤️ When He Cares

88/100

“Prof Olson called me to talk about them and he helped me get through a dark time this summer.”

🛡️ Anti-Cheat Stance

80/100

“Many of us are tired of seeing cheaters get by using AI and this prof isn't letting it get by him.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • uses his past experience to shape this class in a way that is easy to comprehend.
  • Online Savvy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You'll work for your A but he's fair.
  • Easy class, but communication is otherwise.
  • Graded by few things

Theme 3

🛡️ About Integrity Policy

  • Those who used AI were called out and rightfully so.
  • has a bad ai detector and doesnt know how technology works.
  • for those who did anyway were given what they deserved.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed recent reviews (six online, one in-person) with recurring themes on AI policy and clarity support solid confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

1111117 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1