AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Adan Rosillo

ET203 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate unclear, unapproachable instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProVery DifficultUnclear LecturesMandatory AttendanceNo Clear PrerequisitesDiscourages Questions
  • Only one review rates teaching quality at rock bottom with mumbled answers and a poor classroom dynamic.
  • Material jumps into trigonometry without listed prerequisites, leaving students unprepared.
  • and the experience is widely described as very difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Student earned a C in a hard course with , so an A demands real struggle rather than light effort.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Coursework required trigonometry without listed prerequisites and is rated very difficult overall.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and added little comfort given the poor Q and A dynamic.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Quality rated 1 of 5 with and strong complaints about clarity and approachability.

Evidence comes only from the single in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Reported grade was a C in a hard class with no signs of .

Format shift

Based only on the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Comments stress hard trigonometry classwork rather than sheer volume of busywork.

Format shift

Based only on the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Mumbled answers, discouraged questions, and a poor classroom dynamic define the teaching experience.

Format shift

Based only on the single in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention classwork and textbooks but .

Format shift

Based only on the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ET-203 felt unsupportive: mumbled answers, discomfort asking questions, and hard work without listed prerequisites.

Main concern

and surprise trigonometry without stated prerequisites.

What students said

“He also made many classmates including myself uncomfortable to ask questions he would say he answered even though he would mumble consistently, not a great dynamic.”
ET-203

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments focus on difficulty and .

“Very difficult professor.”
ET-203

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No prerequisite were listed to class but he had no problem with assigning classwork that required trigonometry to do. He also made many classmates including myself uncomfortable to ask questions he would say he answered even though he would mumble consistently, not a great dynamic. Very difficult professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting clarity, difficulty, and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

Awful Teaching Clarity

18/100

“he would mumble consistently, not a great dynamic”

8/100

“Very difficult professor.”

Hard Path to a Strong Grade

22/100

“No prerequisite were listed to class but he had no problem with assigning classwork that required trigonometry to do.”

15/100

“Yes”

Theme 1

About Teaching Style

  • he would mumble consistently, not a great dynamic
  • uncomfortable to ask questions he would say he answered
  • Very difficult professor.

Theme 2

About Difficulty and Prerequisites

  • No prerequisite were listed to class but he had no problem with assigning classwork that required trigonometry to do.
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 4
  • C

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

; opinions are consistent but sample size is too small for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ET-2031 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values