AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Noemi Williams

HLED3 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless required; expect , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderLecture heavyDefensive on feedbackAI-sourced materialNo devices in class
  • Students say she docks points heavily on APA 7 and defends incorrect guidance.
  • She struggles to answer questions and blocks phones or laptops in class.
  • Both reviews rate quality 2/5 with and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and heavy APA penalties make an A effortful even when one student still earned an A.

All evidence is from in-person HLED3 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty sits mid-to-high from APA rules and lecture load rather than advanced theory.

All evidence is from in-person HLED3 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

All evidence is from in-person HLED3 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Quality 2/5 twice, zero would-take-again signal, and comments about weak teaching and .

All evidence is from in-person HLED3 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Lecture-heavy with .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students say she cannot answer questions and relies on faulty AI overviews.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

APA on almost every assignment and graded by few things; exams not described.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person HLED3 feels lecture-heavy with , and weak answers to questions.

Main concern

Incorrect APA guidance and defensive response when challenged, plus limited ability to answer content questions.

What students said

“Told us she was seeing a lot of incorrect APA 7 citations in our work and showed us how to do it "correctly". It wasn't and when someone pointed that out she got defensive”
HLED3
“She doesn't really know what she's talking about, and cannot answer questions. She also doesn't let us use laptops or phones during class”
HLED3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam style for HLED3.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She doesn't really know what she's talking about, and cannot answer questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting weak teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She doesn't really know what she's talking about, and cannot answer questions.”

⚖️

22/100

“APA 7 citation is apart of and .”

🚫 Weak Recommendation

18/100

“She gets a lot of information from AI overviews, so it's often wrong.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches like she is new and cannot answer questions
  • Lecture heavy with no laptops or phones allowed
  • Gets information from AI overviews, often wrong

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tough grader on APA 7 citations
  • Graded by few things, participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent in-person reviews, both quality 2, detailed but small sample.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HLED32 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values