AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Claudia Kelley

NUTRO21 · FCS021 · NUTRI021 · NUTRN021 · NUTRTN21 · NUTR021 · NUTRITION21 · NTRTN21 · NUT021 · NUTRTN021 · NTRN21 · 149 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
91.33%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with reading and projects.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit queenClear grading criteriaCaring and organizedReading and project heavyOnline savvy
  • Most students call Nutrition 21 manageable and and support
  • Success depends on staying current with readings, discussions, and a multi-part term project
  • A few students report unresponsive emails or

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many students say an A is realistic with steady work plus abundant , even when the .

Online reviews more often call it an easy A; in-person reviews still stress doing the reports and readings.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material is interesting and not concept-brutal, but , and a .

Both formats describe manageable content with reading intensity; online short terms feel faster.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory in some sections and not required in others.

Online and and optional attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

About nine in , and clear criteria despite a few harsh outliers.

Online majority is strongly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

81/100

, and many A or A+ reports outweigh occasional tough-grader tags.

Format shift

Online students especially highlight grade-boosting .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect , and a multi-part writing project that can exceed ten pages.

Format shift

Online accelerated terms feel heavier; in-person load is similar but usually less rushed.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and strong at connecting nutrition to daily life.

Format shift

Online praise is broader; a few online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and a term project more than pure high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize projects and quizzes; some online terms also mention a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

project guidance, and supportive teaching, plus one sharp complaint about disorganized syllabus emails.

Main concern

A minority report confusing multi-module instructions and .

What students said

“She provides as well as detailed samples of the term project. She truly supports student success.”
NUTR021
“Took Nutrition 021 over Spring 2023 and it's a fun class! The and .”
NUTRN021
“Her 8 page syllabus is disorganized and overly specific.”
NUTRTN021

Remote format

Online

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and easy-to-pass quizzes if you stay organized.

Main concern

Some students struggle with long instructions, email response time, and .

What students said

“Not the hardest class just make and you should have yourself an easy A.”
NTRTN21
“She offers and and encourage her class on how to get an "A".”
NUT021
“She doesn't answer her emails if you're taking her online when you need help”
NTRTN21

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on quizzes, projects, and some finals; reviews do .

Quizzes with multiple attemptsTerm projectFinal exam mentionedPractice questions

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize DWP reports, term projects, and .

Term projectDWP reportsClear grading criteria
“if you want an A In her class please all 3 DWP reports she assigns, study all the material”
NUTRO21
“There were LOTS of opportunities in this class which gives you the freedom to not turn in .”
NUTRTN021

Online

Online students mention quizzes with multiple attempts, reading-based tests, and a .

Quizzes with multiple attemptsReading-based quizzesFinal examTerm project
“With students have the chance to succeed and improve.”
NTRTN21
“A lot of research is required and same with reading, but it helps prepare you for the quizzes and ”
NUT021

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not the hardest class just make sure you submit those assignments and you should have yourself an easy A. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting , workload, and mostly strong recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Prof Claudia has been one of . She genuinely wants all her students to succeed”

🎁 Advantage

90/100

“She gives many opportunities for or so please take advantage of what she's offering.”

📚 Workload Reality

52/100

“There are a lot of work to do in this class. Do not fall behind.”

⚠️ Support Gaps

40/100

“It seems like she doesn't even want to help any students out to succeed”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her material is interactive and she gives a lot of opportunity for
  • She's passionate about the material and wants to make sure her students succeed
  • Ms. Kelley is a and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it's an easy A if your really wanna pass Nutrition 21
  • Success in this course is within reach as long as you put in the effort and do not procrastinate
  • It's not an easy "A", but you get out what you put in.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • be aware that part 3 of the . (around 10+ pages)
  • Prof. Kelley's class is intense be ready to read
  • There are this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

149

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across several years, mostly consistent themes around , workload, and caring teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5124
4 out of 513
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

NUTRTN02113 reviews
NUT02111 reviews
NTRTN2110 reviews
NUTR0214 reviews
NUTRN0213 reviews
Show 6 more courses
NTRN212 reviews
NUTRITION212 reviews
NUTRTN212 reviews
FCS0211 review
NUTRI0211 review
NUTRO211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

36

A+ 12 · A 22 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3