AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yoon Yun

MATH240 · MATHMATH · 227STATS · STATS227 · MATH266 · MATH262 · MATH227 · MATH260 · 127 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Prefer her only for if ; avoid online Calc 2.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarized by courseHeavy homeworkTest heavyTough graderSlow grading
  • In-person stats and and teachable; accelerated Calc 2 is widely hated.
  • Online sections frequently lack professor lecture videos, forcing self-teaching via Pearson and YouTube.
  • , and very slow grade posting dominate negative reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough grading, timed exams, and students unless they grind constantly.

Online calc reviews call As nearly impossible; a effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Content and pace are hard, especially accelerated calculus, with and .

Online calc is described as ; in-person stats is hard but more learnable in lecture.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

and mandatory across sections with no single policy.

; many stats in-person sections mark attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; love for stats teaching clashes with repeated avoid-at-all-costs calc reviews.

In-person stats skew positive; online MATH262/266 skew strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

; and curves are not reliable.

Format shift

; a few online students note occasional final grade bumps.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Lots of , and frequent exams, worse in short terms.

Format shift

Online 5-8 week sections report multi-hour daily workloads.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Caring and , but many calc students say she does not teach and replies only help so much.

Format shift

; online calc complaints about zero lecture videos are loud.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests heavily drive the grade with frequent unit exams and .

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy; online adds Pearson quizzes and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and cheat sheets; Calc 2 students still report self-teaching and .

Main concern

, and delayed grading can tank the experience even face-to-face.

What students said

“She is so funny, omg I loved her. I took her last spring, full semester.”
STATS227
“She doesn't teach material, there aren't any of her own lectures, and .”
MATH262
“Truly the .”
227

Remote format

Online

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online math is homework- and and face timed, harsh exams.

Main concern

No or few professor lectures, insane HW, and .

What students said

“By the time this person posts grades, the .”
MATH262
“ videos are provided, I survived by YouTube.”
MATH262
“ .”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, with limited preparation from instructor lectures.

Timed examsTest heavyHarder than homeworkLimited timeCheat sheets in some stats

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person stats sometimes allow cheat sheets; calc still .

Cheat sheets (stats)Timed hard testsHeavy exam weightSlow grade posting
“Allows cheat sheets, heavy on work in person is the .”
STATS227
“Only one exam (out of 4, including the ends.”
MATH262

Online

Online exams are timed, difficult, and ; several students finish only one of four tests on time.

Timed examsTest heavyNo professor lecture prepPearson-based
“I've only finished 1 of the 4 tests in time.”
MATH262
“Gives limited time for tests and you won't even be able to finish them.”
MATH266

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If she was the last calc 2 teacher in the world I would quit my major. She's the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (30 online, 20 in-person), highlighting the stats-vs-calc split, workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

46/100

“Unlike every other math teacher I've had, I learned the concepts in her class while taking notes.”

⚠️ Calc Warning

20/100

“ . Seems she's good at stats but not so much calc.”

📚 Workload Crush

18/100

“Insane amount of hw even for an 8 week course.”

⏳

30/100

“By the time this professor posts grades, the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is so funny, omg I loved her.
  • .
  • She doesn't teach material, there aren't any of her own lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • RUN AWAY from this class.
  • gives.
  • I earned an A! I am horrible at math.

Theme 3

📝

  • Lots of work. I didn't really know what I was doing.
  • and practice tests.
  • Allows cheat sheets, heavy on work in person is the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

127

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years and courses show a consistent, detailed split between stats praise and calc horror stories.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 561
4 out of 521
3 out of 58
2 out of 511
1 out of 529

Course coverage

MATH26213 reviews
MATH22712 reviews
MATH26611 reviews
227STATS5 reviews
STATS2273 reviews
Show 4 more courses
2272 reviews
MATH2402 reviews
MATH2601 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

16

B+ 2 · B 14

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 4