AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jong Kim

ALG112 · MATH263 · MATH112 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you will show up, do the homework, and ask questions—especially for stats—rather than seeking a no-work free A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesCaring and helpfulExtra creditHomework mattersMust-take for Stats
  • Students who struggled with , and a .
  • , and use and practice sheets.
  • One older negative calls him hard to understand and a , but recent reviews strongly push back.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

A is realistic if , and study, with buffers, but one missed quiz item can hurt.

Almost all A-effort evidence is in person; the single online review says one wrong answer can kill the A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Math/stats content is manageable with his teaching but not trivial; students still need to study and keep up.

In-person students emphasize his clarity makes hard material tolerable; online sample is too small to generalize.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Multiple tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass; participation matters.

In-person clearly attendance-linked; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and support despite a few low older ratings.

In-person recommendations dominate; online only one neutral-ish review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Clear criteria, dropped lowest test, and help, but he can still feel like a .

Format shift

; online notes high cost per missed question.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and exams; manageable if you stay on top of it.

Format shift

; online is test/quiz concentrated.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students highlight , and real care for struggling math students.

Format shift

Praise .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Homework and quizzes matter, but , and test-heavy tags define the course.

Format shift

; online graded by few high-stakes items.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and strong recommend for students who study.

Main concern

Attendance/participation matter and .

What students said

“Statistics is already a tough subject and for someone who is not great at math this professor is hands down a .”
MATH227
“ and always makes sure everyone understands. Also soo sweet!”
MATH227
“He gives 7 exams and . He also provides ”
MATH112

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

not bad overall, but .

Main concern

Very few graded items so mistakes are costly.

What students said

“I mean it's not bad, but 1 question wrong on a and you already lost your A.”
MATH263

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams align with practice and homework; tough if unprepared but predictable and supported by reviews and EC.

Practice sheets before testsMultiple examsDrop lowest testExtra creditQuizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests often match practice sheets, with , and review of .

Practice sheets almost identical to tests7 exams drop lowestExtra creditHomework before exams
“The so theres no suprises.”
ALG112
“He gives 7 exams and . He also provides ”
MATH112

Online

Single online review implies high-stakes quizzes/exams where one miss can cost the A; .

High-stakes quizzesHigh-stakes examsGraded by few things
“1 question wrong on a and you already lost your A.”
MATH263

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Statistics is already a tough subject and for someone who is not great at math this professor is hands down a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (1 online, 10 in person), emphasizing clarity and effort-for-reward success. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯

86/100

“ and always makes sure everyone understands. Also soo sweet!”

⭐

78/100

“for someone who is not great at math this professor is hands down a .”

📝 Do the Work

62/100

“If you study and do the work you will pass. Do all the homework and Quizzes.”

⚠️ Minority Struggle

35/100

“Very difficult to understand, an and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • willing to do your part
  • .w prior to the exams
  • if someone is lost

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the work is very manageable
  • 1 question wrong on a and you already lost your A
  • JUST STUDY and DONT slake off and you'll get that A

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • great professor and willing to help if you need it don't be afraid to ask questions
  • He also provides , there's no excuse to fail his class
  • Also soo sweet!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

11 reviews with consistent recent praise and multi-year span, but small sample and only one online review limit certainty.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2275 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
ALG1121 review
MATH1121 review
MATH2631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1