AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Karineh Abed

MATH240 · MATH260PRECAL · MATH265 · STATISTICS · MATH238 · MATH227 · MATH260 · MATH227S · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Only take her if and ; otherwise pick another professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of HomeworkPolarizing LecturesTough GraderSelf-Study HeavyTest Heavy
  • and fair, others say lectures are useless and .
  • Workload is consistently heavy with , and frequent tests.
  • Grades from A to F appear; success usually requires outside videos, tutoring, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn As with and practice tests, but , and low grades despite effort.

Online and in-person both show As and failing grades; online has slightly more easy-A claims with lowest-score replacement.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Calc and stats content is paced fast, concepts often feel under-explained, and students repeatedly self-teach.

Both formats describe challenging math; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

notes mixed with optional online sections.

Online is often more flexible; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; fans cite care and structure while critics warn against self-teaching and .

Online and clearly better.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

and partial-credit rules frustrate students, though and lowest-score replacement.

Format shift

; some online students report clearer Canvas criteria.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Nearly every review mentions lots of , and timed exams that pile up weekly.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy load; short-session and stats courses get the harshest workload complaints.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and and unhelpful emails for many others.

Format shift

Online lecture quality is criticized more often; in-person students still report book-copy lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades mix Cengage or , and Canvas or timed exams.

Format shift

Online leans ; and paper work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some find her caring with book and leaves concepts unexplained.

Main concern

, and fast pace force heavy self-study.

What students said

“I really had to self calculus”
MATH260
“She gives lots of work, be prepared to spend 40 hours weekly on homework”
MATH227S
“she tells, she doesn't teach”
MATH265

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some praise flexible deadlines and and nearly useless.

Main concern

Lectures often feel incomplete, so students rely on external videos and and tough projects.

What students said

“her lectures have a bunch of parts cut out and are genuinely useless”
MATH260
“I'm a 4.0 student but this was the ”
MATH238
“She replaces your lowest score with the !!”
MATH260

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some sections allow formula sheets while others are test-heavy and strict.

Practice testsCanvas examsFormula or cheat sheets sometimesTimed quizzesLowest score replaced by final

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some allow formula or cheat sheets while practice tests may not fully match.

Show detailed workFormula sheet sometimesCheat sheets allowed in some sectionsTimed bi-weekly exams
“You are able to use cheat sheets”
MATH260
“She lets you have a formula sheet on the test”
MATH227

Online

Online exams and ; one section replaces lowest score with the final.

Canvas examsPractice testsHomework-aligned examsLowest score replacement
“ and you get 2 opportunities to do it”
MATH260
“ ”
MATH260

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you are good at teaching yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews across online and , and self-study needs. Credibility rating: High.

📚

22/100

“be prepared to spend 40 hours weekly on homework”

🧭 Self-Teaching Required

48/100

“I really had to self calculus”

❤️ Caring but Uneven

48/100

“ and is very open and accessible”

⚠️ Polarized Recommendation

48/100

“TAKE IT RIGHT NOT, ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures have a bunch of parts cut out and are genuinely useless
  • she tells, she doesn't teach
  • The videos and lectures make topics easy to comprehend

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • VERY DIFFICULT to get an F
  • She was never satisfied with the projects

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • 16 assignments... about 25 questions
  • So much hw, its hard to complete some on time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

36 detailed reviews spanning 2018-2026 across multiple math courses with consistent workload themes and polarized quality.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH23811 reviews
MATH2608 reviews
MATH2277 reviews
MATH2654 reviews
MATH227S2 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH2402 reviews
MATH260PRECAL1 review
STATISTICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1