AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Kelly Enos

AJ5 · AJ · ADMN1234 · AJ4 · ADMJ004 · AJ75 · ADJUS001 · ADMJ005 · AJ1 · ADMINJUST · ADMJUS001 · AJ006 · ADMJUST · CRIMINALJUSTIC · AJ1245 · AJ3086 · AJ0000 · ADMJU006 · AJ004 · AJ2 · AJV9999 · AJ50000 · AJ02 · AJ25 · ANYAJCLASS · AJCRIM · AJ160 · AJ04 · AJ3112 · AJAJ · AJ6 · 47 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Worth taking for AJ if you show up and study the guides, but verify current course quality after recent complaints.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging AJ lecturesStudy-guide testsJeopardy reviewLittle homeworkCop humor
  • Long history of students calling him the best AJ professor if , and use study guides.
  • Assessments center on midterm, final, and a .
  • Very recent reviews claim lost passion and weak online teaching, so current experience may lag older hype.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many say an A is realistic with notes, study guides, , and showing .

; the online F is an outlier self-study failure case.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is standard AJ intro material made approachable, though courts keywords and .

In-person difficulty feels moderate; online felt hard due to poor support not concept depth alone.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

and some mark it mandatory, yet a few classes say he does not care if .

; online lists attendance mandatory with little teaching value.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Historic student love is huge, but and recent passion or online complaints create caution.

; recent and online notes pull the recommendation down.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

, draft reviews, and recovery chances help, but tough graders and keyword midterms appear in some AJ courts classes.

Format shift

; online grading felt senseless to one student.

Workload

Light

76/100

Little weekly homework; , and reading or notes.

Format shift

In-person is light busywork; .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

, and inspiring for AJ careers, offset by a few bias and recent disorganization claims.

Format shift

; online teaching evidence is poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and final with study guides and .

Format shift

and paper centered; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Decades of in-person reviews praise funny engaging lectures, Jeopardy reviews, and easy passes with notes and study guides.

Main concern

and keyword-heavy; a few students felt personal bias or lost passion recently.

What students said

“ .”
AJ160
“ ”
AJ1
“ and ...All you and show up to class.”
AJ75

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative , and failing to learn.

Main concern

Online felt unsupported and students report learning almost nothing from the professor.

What students said

“I honestly did not learn anything from the professor. All we were asked to do was read the book.”
AJ160
“ .”
AJ160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

easy with notes, Jeopardy, and study guides.

Midterm and finalStudy guidesJeopardy reviewResearch paperKeyword heavy tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final style with study guides, Jeopardy, and note-taking; some keyword memorization is hard.

Midterm and finalStudy guidesJeopardy before testsResearch paper
“Before any quiz,midterm,test, he plays jeopardy, and .”
AJ1
“ of keywords you are required to memorize.”
ADMJ004

Online

Online comments do not clearly prove proctoring; they mainly describe book reading and .

Book-based workUnclear assignments
“All we were asked to do was read the book.”
AJ160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“best professor I have taken hands down. Will answer and as long as you study and are dedicated, you will pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews, weighting long-run AJ praise against sparse recent negatives. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Enos will make you want to go to school. He has a great heart and is always willing to help.”

📝

58/100

“Class is made up of , and final.”

😊 Easy Pass Path

78/100

“His class is super easy if you just study when you need to.”

⚠️ Recent Concerns

35/100

“Don't waste your time , he's lost his passion , sloppy and disorganized class and didn't learn much.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Interesting and funny teacher
  • He makes the class fun with a game of jeopardy
  • his cop humor is hilarious

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy to get an A
  • Do the study guides and review them well, and

Theme 3

⚠️ About Red Flags

  • he's lost his passion
  • I honestly did not learn anything from the professor
  • If he doesn't like you, you'll fail for sure

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

47

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-seven reviews over many years give rich detail, with only one online sample and a recent negative shift to weigh.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 57
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

AJ15 reviews
AJ1604 reviews
AJ54 reviews
AJ0043 reviews
ADMJ0042 reviews
Show 26 more courses
AJ022 reviews
AJ22 reviews
AJAJ2 reviews
ADJUS0011 review
ADMINJUST1 review
ADMJ0051 review
ADMJU0061 review
ADMJUS0011 review
ADMJUST1 review
ADMN12341 review
AJ1 review
AJ00001 review
AJ0061 review
AJ041 review
AJ12451 review
AJ251 review
AJ30861 review
AJ31121 review
AJ41 review
AJ500001 review
AJ61 review
AJ751 review
AJCRIM1 review
AJV99991 review
ANYAJCLASS1 review
CRIMINALJUSTIC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values