AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Beverly Gunderson

M07 · MATH112 · STATS227 · MATH102 · MATH227 · MATH123C · MATH125 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a and grades fairly when you do the work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing lecturesCaring and patientExams from homeworkClear explanationsHighly recommended
  • learn
  • and
  • Attendance and steady work matter more than pure natural talent

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic if , and use her notes, but lower grades are common without steady effort.

Online and ; grades still vary with effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is real college math with moderate pace and .

A few online sections felt harder due to weaker lecture support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and missing class makes lectures and in-class work hard to recover.

some online comments.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Nearly all students would take her again and call her among the and care.

Recommendation is strongest in person; online is mostly positive with a few strong dissenters.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Students describe fair grading with , and exams matching homework.

Format shift

One older online review called her a ; most others say fair.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and steady study time, but the load is doable if paced.

Format shift

Online comments mention more .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students praise clear lectures, patience with math anxiety, and .

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is near-universal; online quality is high for most but mixed for a few.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades mix homework, quizzes, and .

Format shift

and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students consistently call her one of the , and exams pulled from homework.

Main concern

Pace can be fast and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH227
“She is understanding and a !”
STATS227
“ . No other math professor does that.”
MATH102

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Most online students praise short clear lectures and doable structure, but a few warn that weak video support and .

Main concern

Occasional online sections feel like self-teaching with lots of homework and little lecture help.

What students said

“Her lectures were really short and straight to the point, and the structure of the class was easy to understand.”
MATH227
“Lectures were clear and focused. There was a lot of homework, but it was doable and .”
MATH102
“ . Doesn't provide lectures and instead gives videos which usually don't help.”
m07

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and lectures, which students find fair and predictable.

Homework-aligned examsIndex card on quizzesQuizzes and tests mirror lectures

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as coming straight from homework, with occasional quiz cheat sheets.

Exams from homeworkQuiz index card allowedIn-class quizzes
“ .”
MATH125
“ but allows you to use 1 3x5 index card as a cheat sheet.”
MATH102

Online

Online students report exams similar to homework with some harder items and .

Exams similar to homeworkQuizzes and tests like lectures
“ questions.”
MATH102
“The hw is exactly like her lectures and so and tests.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Gunderson is one of the ! She made Statistics so much easier in my opinion.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 , and care for students. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“I understood almost everything she taught, and she explained everything so good.”

👍

90/100

“ .”

📝

78/100

“ .”

❤️ Caring Support

85/100

“She is understanding and a !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof actually teaches and wants you to learn
  • She's great at lecturing and if you don't

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There was a lot of homework, but it was doable
  • Do the homework and attend class, you will pass

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I cannot say enough great things about Professor Gunderson
  • She really cares for her students and not to mention she is funny
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen detailed reviews across multiple math courses and years show strong consistency on teaching quality and .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2275 reviews
MATH1023 reviews
STATS2273 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
m071 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH1121 review
MATH123C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1