AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

G. Godjoian

CHEM65 · CHEM0817 · CHEM51 · CHEM212 · OCHEM · CHEM051 · CHEM065 · CHEM101 · CHEM102 · CHEM211 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
23.53%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel in chemistry and can .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyRude and unapproachableOverwhelming quizzesSelf-teach chemistry
  • Many students report rude interactions and fear of asking questions
  • Grades and
  • A minority who use office hours extensively report real learning gains

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Even strong students report Cs, Ds, Fs, and drops because .

Online and ; few As appear overall.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Content and pace feel overwhelming, with dense lectures and constant high-stakes testing.

OChem and Chem65 in person and online both describe extreme difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and missing class or lab worsens an already unforgiving structure.

In-person and online hybrid sections both stress showing up for quizzes and labs.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students explicitly warn others not to enroll due to teaching style, attitude, and grading.

; a small in-person minority defends her rigor.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly say she docks points for tiny mistakes and bases grades .

Format shift

Harsh grading appears in both online proctored sections and .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

, and heavy study hours leave little recovery room.

Format shift

Online OChem and in-person Chem65 both report crushing weekly load.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

, and dismissive answers to questions.

Format shift

A few office-hour users like her; classroom experience is mostly poor across formats.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Quizzes and the tests.

Format shift

True for online proctored exams and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews overwhelmingly call her rude, lecture-heavy, and and fail rates.

Main concern

, and unapproachable classroom manner.

What students said

“She is difficult and rude. Felt like I was teaching myself chem.”
CHEM65
“ ! She gives very few practice problems to do”
OCHEM
“Avoid. Avoid. Avoid.”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online and hybrid reviews are mostly , and poor communication.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and Microphone!”
CHEM211
“Webcam was required to be on while and exams.”
CHEM051
“The ”
CHEM65

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and frequently described as much harder than practice.

Webcam proctoringTest heavyPop quizzesPoints off for minor errors

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections are quiz- and and little exam-aligned practice.

Weekly quizzesTest heavyPoints off for minor errorsLecture-heavy exams
“ on top of the workload.”
CHEM65
“ if you make minor errors.”
CHEM51
“Ur .”
OCHEM

Online

Online reviews explicitly describe webcam and .

Webcam requiredMicrophone proctoringSudden quizzesFully proctored exams
“ and Microphone!”
CHEM211
“Webcam was required to be on while and exams.”
CHEM051
“ AND PROCTORED.”
CHEM211

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She is always in a bad mood, has a nasty attitude and hates answering questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 , and classroom climate. Credibility rating: High.

🚨 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“Felt like I was teaching myself chem.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“Please do the right thing and !”

⚖️

12/100

“Constant homework and quizzes and a ; .”

📷

15/100

“If your eyeballs move to the and fail you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Classes are just notetaking with little actual teaching
  • You get out of the lecture being even more confused than you were when you went in class
  • I honestly had to because of how scary she was to even ask a question

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Ur
  • NO ONE PASSED THE CLASS WITH AN A OR B ONLY C'S OR FAILS
  • if you make minor errors

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Shes often rude and dismissive when students ask questions
  • Always has a bad attitude, unapproachable
  • Avoid. Avoid. Avoid.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews over many years are , and poor classroom climate.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 521

Course coverage

CHEM6511 reviews
CHEM515 reviews
OCHEM5 reviews
CHEM1013 reviews
CHEM1023 reviews
Show 5 more courses
CHEM2113 reviews
CHEM2122 reviews
CHEM0511 review
CHEM0651 review
CHEM08171 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 5

D range

3

D 3

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1