AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Shari Barke

NUTRTN021 · HEALTH011 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
83.33%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her for a supportive nutrition or health class where timely work and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringClear grading criteriaAllows late workEasy weekly workHelpful feedback
  • Most students call her sweet, caring, and .
  • Work can pile up in accelerated sections but is usually easy and straightforward.
  • One outlier calls her a , but grades and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students report As with regular submissions, late flexibility, and straightforward criteria.

Online comments most directly promise an A if you submit work; but one C- outlier exists.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Material is interesting and approachable, with light-to-moderate difficulty for most reviewers.

Both formats rate difficulty low to mid; accelerated online adds volume more than conceptual hardness.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others, especially online, do not.

; some in-person health sections say attendance matters.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

83/100

Five of six reviews are strongly positive and and clarity.

Online and review coming from in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Clear criteria, late work allowed, and mostly .

Format shift

Online students emphasize lenient clarity; .

Workload

Light

68/100

but is repeatedly described as easy.

Format shift

Online accelerated load is higher volume; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students describe her as , and focused on real self-care applications.

Format shift

Positive teaching praise appears in both formats despite one harsh personality critique.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Discussions, weekly homework, projects, and .

Format shift

and ; online is more continuous coursework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students highlight caring lectures, attendance importance in some sections, study guides, and late-assignment flexibility.

Main concern

One student found late penalties harsh and said was limited.

What students said

“she cares about the students gives time to turn in late assignments”
NUTRTN021
“Professor Barke is caring and wants you to pass. She gives you study guides for mid-term and the final.”
HEALTH011
“ .”
NUTRTN021

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online sections are straightforward, often asynchronous, with , and high A rates.

Main concern

Accelerated online terms still mean lots of if tasks are easy.

What students said

“Mine was an accelerated class so yes lots of hw each week but they were super easy.”
NUTRTN021
“The class was all online with no meetings but the class was very straightforward with .”
NUTRTN021
“ and submit your work and you should get an A!”
NUTRTN021

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments feel student-friendly with , and flexible submission policies.

Study guidesClear grading criteriaLate work allowedProject-based components

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final plus a semester wellness project broken into mini parts.

Study guides for midterm and finalBody Mind Wellness projectAttendance can matter
“She gives you study guides for mid-term and the final.”
HEALTH011
“There is an easy Body Mind Wellness project due at the end of semester but she breaks .”
HEALTH011

Online

Online , and easy weekly work rather than strict proctoring.

Clear online criteriaDiscussion responsesEasy homework
“The class was all online with no meetings but the class was very straightforward with .”
NUTRTN021
“they were super easy. Teacher is sweet and .”
NUTRTN021

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and submit your work and you should get an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting care, clarity, and grade accessibility. Credibility rating: Medium.

💗 Caring Teacher

86/100

“she cares about the students gives time to turn in late assignments”

🅰️ Easy Path To A

82/100

“ and submit your work and you should get an A!”

📋

78/100

“the class was very straightforward with .”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Teacher is sweet and .
  • Professor Barke is caring and wants you to pass.
  • she seems like a very nice, caring professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • lots of hw each week but they were super easy.
  • Allows late work.
  • .

Theme 3

📚 About Learning Value

  • Learned a lot of interesting stuff in this class!!
  • I learned so much from her class that go beyond just academics.
  • You will learn a lot of very good information in her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only six detailed reviews with mixed years and one strong negative, so but sample size is limited.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUTRTN0215 reviews
HEALTH0111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values