AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Anjum Qureshi

CHEM065 · CHEM101 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend every lecture, practice constantly, and use office hours; skip if you need an easy or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but polarizingLecture heavyTough graderStep-by-step helpMandatory attendance
  • and and drop.
  • Chemistry stays demanding with , and .
  • She often allows note cards or a periodic table and rewards participation and office hours.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

and heavy practice for mid grades, so an A usually takes real sustained effort.

Online has one A success story; most grade struggle comments come from in-person CHEM065.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Chemistry content, fast or heavy lectures, and frequent practice make the material intellectually demanding for many students.

Online difficulty felt lower in the single review; in-person comments more often call the class tough.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that missing lectures quickly throws students off.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

About two-thirds would take her again, but a vocal and workload issues.

The lone online review is strongly positive; in-person opinion is split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

and hard grading comments outweigh occasional credit for participation or partial work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Workload complaints concentrate in in-person CHEM065.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Many call her caring and , while a and feel intimidating.

Format shift

Online feedback is glowing; .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and labs rather than exams only.

Format shift

and tests; labs are mainly in-person CHEM101.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CHEM065/CHEM101 reviews are mixed: supporters praise caring help and , and heavy homework.

Main concern

Tough grading, lecture-heavy pace, and .

What students said

“Chemistry is tough, but .”
CHEM065
“Bad professor. Cannot teach. A lot of and switched for another professor. ”
CHEM065
“She was an amazing professor but if you can't handle her correcting you.”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One strong online CHEM065 review , and real learning support.

Main concern

Only one online review, so online experience is not well proven.

What students said

“Professor Qureshi knows how to make Chemistry easier to understand, and she cares that her students have a good foundation for future.”
CHEM065

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are real chemistry tests, but several students report note cards or a personal periodic table are allowed.

Note cards allowed on some testsPeriodic table allowedParticipation creditHeavy tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but some classes allow note cards, notes, or a periodic table and reward showing work.

Note cards or notes on some testsOwn periodic table allowedTests are heavy
“She does not require you to memorize the periodic table, she allows you to .”
CHEM065
“She allows note cards and notes for .”
CHEM065

Online

The single online review ; it focuses on lectures and homework helping tests.

Homework supports testsDetailed assignment feedback
“Both her lecture and and tests.”
CHEM065

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Chemistry is tough, but . She gives credit for participation and showing your work, even if the answer is wrong.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting and heavy chemistry workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Support

70/100

“She was also very funny. students.”

⚠️ Polarized Teaching

42/100

“the class felt terrible felt very weird cause the teacher couldn't teach it was hard to understand but she has a .”

📚 Heavy Chemistry Work

32/100

“A lot of and switched for another professor. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I like that she won't move on until majority of the class understand it.
  • Tells you how a thing works but just says that's what it is with no real teaching

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • she grades hard and heavy
  • you have to work hard for this class and really pay attention
  • You can earn a sure A if you reread attend class and reread the notes

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she cares deeply for her students
  • The teacher as an individual is great
  • and willing to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews span many years with mixed but detailed comments; quality is polarized, so confidence is medium-high rather than perfect.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM10110 reviews
CHEM0657 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2